A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Holding pattern reporting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 05, 08:50 PM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Now" is fine, providing that you are a good enough multitasker to be on top
of any required turn. However, because timing is one of the requirements of
a holding pattern (adjust outbound to make inbound one minute), "now"
suffers in comparison to "at oh-five past the hour," which should trigger a
stop-watch hack by the pilot. "Now" certainly serves the purpose of letting
the controller clear the next guy.

Bob Gardner

"Stubby" wrote in message
...
What is the "time". "Now" that is, the time of my utterance, seems
sufficient. What am I missing in your AIM quote?


Bob Gardner wrote:
AIM 5-3-3 says that the "time and altitude of flight level upon reaching
a holding fix or point to which cleared" should be made without ATC
request. In some cases, ATC may be waiting for your report of crossing
the holding fix to enter the hold before issuing a clearance to another
aircraft...if you wait until you have completed an entry, or a turn in
the hold, you are just screwing up the timing for someone else.

Bob Gardner

"Yossarian" wrote in message
. 97.142...

At what point do you report holding to ATC? Upon reaching the holding
fix,
or when you are established in the hold and again crossing the fix? For
example, your direction of flight makes a parallel entry appropriate.
You
cross the fix and turn outbound. Should you report then or wait till you
have turned and crossed the fix again? My instructor and I disagree on
this.

The only thing I can find is in the AIM, 5-3-7-f which states "Pilots
should report to ATC the time and altitude/flight level at which the
aircraft reaches the clearance limit and report leaving the clearance
limit." To me that means you report upon crossing the fix the first
time.

Or is this a difference between what the AIM says and what actual
practice
is?






__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Bill Plummer, BBN 1971 - 1980



  #2  
Old June 29th 05, 09:06 PM
Stubby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Gardner wrote:
"Now" is fine, providing that you are a good enough multitasker to be on top
of any required turn. However, because timing is one of the requirements of
a holding pattern (adjust outbound to make inbound one minute), "now"
suffers in comparison to "at oh-five past the hour," which should trigger a
stop-watch hack by the pilot. "Now" certainly serves the purpose of letting
the controller clear the next guy.


Do controllers put that time into a computer which assists in
separation? Are we assuming VFR?
  #3  
Old July 1st 05, 09:15 PM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry about the delay in replying. The controller need not enter the time or
even think about it...timing the holding pattern is the pilot's
responsibility. If the controller's flow plan has another plane
approaching/descending to the same holding fix, all he needs is the report
of entering. I think the time report is just for the audio tape.

And, of course, there is no such thing as a VFR holding pattern. In my
experience, if ATC wants me to kill time when VFR they will tell me to stay
clear of the airspace that I wanted to enter and circle. Where and how is up
to me.

I remember one night way back when, when I was arriving at Reno for the air
races and it was after dark. Everybody was VFR, and ATC had us all hanging
around in the vicinity of the VOR with no other separation than that we
imposed on ourselves...lotta plane-to-plane chatter about altitudes and
general direction from the VOR.

Bob Gardner

"Stubby" wrote in message
...
Bob Gardner wrote:
"Now" is fine, providing that you are a good enough multitasker to be on
top of any required turn. However, because timing is one of the
requirements of a holding pattern (adjust outbound to make inbound one
minute), "now" suffers in comparison to "at oh-five past the hour," which
should trigger a stop-watch hack by the pilot. "Now" certainly serves the
purpose of letting the controller clear the next guy.


Do controllers put that time into a computer which assists in separation?
Are we assuming VFR?



  #4  
Old July 2nd 05, 10:02 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
...

Sorry about the delay in replying. The controller need not enter the time
or even think about it...timing the holding pattern is the pilot's
responsibility. If the controller's flow plan has another plane
approaching/descending to the same holding fix, all he needs is the report
of entering. I think the time report is just for the audio tape.


Well, since the tape has a time reference, there should be no need for the
pilot to report the time at all.



And, of course, there is no such thing as a VFR holding pattern.


There's one over Rush Lake, Wisconsin.



In my experience, if ATC wants me to kill time when VFR they will tell me
to
stay clear of the airspace that I wanted to enter and circle. Where and
how is up to me.


What if you're already in that airspace?



I remember one night way back when, when I was arriving at Reno for the
air races and it was after dark. Everybody was VFR, and ATC had us all
hanging around in the vicinity of the VOR with no other separation than
that we imposed on ourselves...lotta plane-to-plane chatter about
altitudes and general direction from the VOR.


Okay, but what if you were in Class B airspace?


  #5  
Old July 3rd 05, 02:53 AM
Wizard of Draws
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 7/2/05 5:02 PM, in article
.net, "Steven P.
McNicoll" spewed:

And, of course, there is no such thing as a VFR holding pattern.


There's one over Rush Lake, Wisconsin.



How is a VFR rated pilot expected to know how to execute a holding pattern?
Or are they just expected to loiter in a general area centered above a
prominent landmark?
--
Jeff 'The Wizard of Draws' Bucchino

Cartoons with a Touch of Magic
http://www.wizardofdraws.com

More Cartoons with a Touch of Magic
http://www.cartoonclipart.com

  #6  
Old July 3rd 05, 05:06 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wizard of Draws" wrote in
message news:BEECBD61.7D952%jeffbTAKEOUTALLCAPS@TOEMAILwiz ardofdraws.com...

How is a VFR rated pilot expected to know how to execute a holding
pattern?
Or are they just expected to loiter in a general area centered above a
prominent landmark?


See the AirVenture NOTAM, pages 8 and 9.

http://www.airventure.org/2005/flying/2005_NOTAM.pdf


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Pattern Entry Procedures - FAA Guidance Bill Denton Piloting 15 January 22nd 04 02:13 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM
Holding Pattern Entries Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 17 July 11th 03 05:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.