A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DME req'd on ILS (not ILS-DME) approach?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd 03, 08:27 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:47:47 -0500, Don Faulkner
wrote:

Hi folks. I've got a bit of a puzzle here.
First off, I'm a student pilot, so maybe I haven't gotten to this yet.

Take a look at the ILS 18 plate for Springdale, AR (ASG):
http://myairplane.com/databases/appr...l/ASG_ir18.pdf

First, note that the approach is "ILS RWY 18"
---
Next, read in the notes section:
Circling NA east of Rwy 18-36, inoperative table does not apply.
DME from RZC VORTAC
Simultaneous reception of I-ASG and RZC DME required.
---

So, the way I read this, DME is not required, since the approach is ILS
not ILS DME, but it is required since "simultaneous reception ... is
required."

I guess my real question is, "Is this approach authorized for an aircraft
without DME? And if not, why don't they call it ILS-DME?" but read on for
my thinking...


Under the approach naming conventions used by TERPS, DME only appears in
the approach name if it is required in order to fly the FINAL approach
segment. "ILS procedures do not require DME to fly the final approach, even
if a DME fix has been substituted for one of the marker beacons, therefore,
ILS procedures shall not be named ILS/DME. If a procedure requires DME to
fly the final approach, the suffix “DME” shall be added; ..."

And my interpretation of the note is that, indeed, DME is legally required
to fly the approach. It is used to ID two of the IAF's and could be used
to ID the MAP (for the LOC approach) and/or Westy (it's not necessary for
either one). And yes, you could fly the approach without DME by navigating
to NOBBY as the IAF; and using timing if you are using the LOC approach;
and using radials to ID WESTY.

I don't know the requirements for putting a DME required note in the
procedure, when it is possible to fly at least one of the charted
procedures without using DME.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #2  
Old October 2nd 03, 08:30 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
...

And my interpretation of the note is that, indeed, DME is legally required
to fly the approach. It is used to ID two of the IAF's and could be used
to ID the MAP (for the LOC approach) and/or Westy (it's not necessary for
either one). And yes, you could fly the approach without DME by

navigating
to NOBBY as the IAF; and using timing if you are using the LOC approach;
and using radials to ID WESTY.

I don't know the requirements for putting a DME required note in the
procedure, when it is possible to fly at least one of the charted
procedures without using DME.


You're saying this approach can be flown without DME yet you believe DME is
legally required to fly this approach?


  #3  
Old October 2nd 03, 10:07 PM
Mike Granby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

You're saying this approach can be flown without DME yet
you believe DME is legally required to fly this approach?


Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate,
even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving
radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed
recently.)

--
Mike Granby, PP-ASEL,IA
Warrior N44578
http://www.mikeg.net/plane



  #4  
Old October 3rd 03, 06:08 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Granby" wrote in message
...

Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the

plate,
even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving
radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed
recently.)


This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED".


  #5  
Old October 3rd 03, 03:20 PM
Ray Andraka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Please see my not in the SLE LOC BC RWY13 thread regarding DME on ILS's. FAA
has an initiative to standardiae ILS approaches that has the effect of making
many of the existing ILS approaches DME required where they were not before.
It happened to Providence this summer. We used to have 2 ILSs that did not
require DME and one that did. Now every approach into Providence with the
exception of the VOR 5, VOR 34 and NDB 5 approaches requires DME or IFR GPS.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Mike Granby" wrote in message
...

Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the

plate,
even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving
radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed
recently.)


This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED".


--
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950
email
http://www.andraka.com

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The perfect approach Capt.Doug Home Built 25 December 3rd 04 03:37 AM
Established on the approach - Checkride question endre Instrument Flight Rules 59 October 6th 03 04:36 PM
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types Tarver Engineering Instrument Flight Rules 2 August 5th 03 03:50 AM
IR checkride story! Guy Elden Jr. Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 1st 03 09:03 PM
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach Giwi Instrument Flight Rules 11 July 24th 03 07:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.