![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:47:47 -0500, Don Faulkner
wrote: Hi folks. I've got a bit of a puzzle here. First off, I'm a student pilot, so maybe I haven't gotten to this yet. Take a look at the ILS 18 plate for Springdale, AR (ASG): http://myairplane.com/databases/appr...l/ASG_ir18.pdf First, note that the approach is "ILS RWY 18" --- Next, read in the notes section: Circling NA east of Rwy 18-36, inoperative table does not apply. DME from RZC VORTAC Simultaneous reception of I-ASG and RZC DME required. --- So, the way I read this, DME is not required, since the approach is ILS not ILS DME, but it is required since "simultaneous reception ... is required." I guess my real question is, "Is this approach authorized for an aircraft without DME? And if not, why don't they call it ILS-DME?" but read on for my thinking... Under the approach naming conventions used by TERPS, DME only appears in the approach name if it is required in order to fly the FINAL approach segment. "ILS procedures do not require DME to fly the final approach, even if a DME fix has been substituted for one of the marker beacons, therefore, ILS procedures shall not be named ILS/DME. If a procedure requires DME to fly the final approach, the suffix “DME” shall be added; ..." And my interpretation of the note is that, indeed, DME is legally required to fly the approach. It is used to ID two of the IAF's and could be used to ID the MAP (for the LOC approach) and/or Westy (it's not necessary for either one). And yes, you could fly the approach without DME by navigating to NOBBY as the IAF; and using timing if you are using the LOC approach; and using radials to ID WESTY. I don't know the requirements for putting a DME required note in the procedure, when it is possible to fly at least one of the charted procedures without using DME. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... And my interpretation of the note is that, indeed, DME is legally required to fly the approach. It is used to ID two of the IAF's and could be used to ID the MAP (for the LOC approach) and/or Westy (it's not necessary for either one). And yes, you could fly the approach without DME by navigating to NOBBY as the IAF; and using timing if you are using the LOC approach; and using radials to ID WESTY. I don't know the requirements for putting a DME required note in the procedure, when it is possible to fly at least one of the charted procedures without using DME. You're saying this approach can be flown without DME yet you believe DME is legally required to fly this approach? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
You're saying this approach can be flown without DME yet you believe DME is legally required to fly this approach? Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate, even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed recently.) -- Mike Granby, PP-ASEL,IA Warrior N44578 http://www.mikeg.net/plane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate, even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed recently.) This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please see my not in the SLE LOC BC RWY13 thread regarding DME on ILS's. FAA
has an initiative to standardiae ILS approaches that has the effect of making many of the existing ILS approaches DME required where they were not before. It happened to Providence this summer. We used to have 2 ILSs that did not require DME and one that did. Now every approach into Providence with the exception of the VOR 5, VOR 34 and NDB 5 approaches requires DME or IFR GPS. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Is that so unusual? The ILS into CXY used to have ADF REQUIRED on the plate, even though you could easily fly it without such equipment if receiving radar vectors. (The plate now says ADF or RADAR, but was only changed recently.) This plate does not say "DME REQUIRED". -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |