A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Who does flight plans?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 05, 07:24 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
True, it is just the wing that is stalling. At the onset of stall the
airplane will settle very smoothly to the runway assuming that the wheels
are very close when the stall occurs.


You really should have gone and read this whole thread before reviving it.
This trail has been worn quite smooth already, and you're on the wrong side
of correctness with respect to the possibility of a literal "full-stall
landing".

You somehow seem to think that you can let the airplane down more
gradually using elevator while at a higher speed than what occurs when the
wing stalls. This simply isn't the case in most airplanes. When the wing
stalls, the lost of list is fairly dramatic, but it still takes time for
the airplane to accelerate downward. If you are within inches of the
runway, this will set you onto the ground very gently. Few pilots can do
a more gently touchdown using elevator control alone.


You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while "within
inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the ground first.

It is obvious that you weren't taught full-stall landings (by that I mean
having the control wheel full-aft and the stall horn blaring at the moment
of touchdown) and don't know how they are done or how good the results can
be when done properly.


Obvious? What's obvious is that you are making statements without having
the knowledge to back them up. It's also obvious you don't have the good
sense to avoid insulting someone else's flying ability without ensuring
first that you have a clue about what you're talking about.

I can't vouch for George's flying ability, but there's nothing in his posts
to suggest it's anything less than stellar. Your denigration of his flying
skills was completely unjustified.

You should find an instructor competent in this area and take a lesson or
two. It will be both fun and enlightening.


Take your own advice.

Pete


  #2  
Old July 2nd 05, 09:09 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while
"within inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the
ground first.


Pete, what are the numbers on that? (Sorry if I missed it earlier in the
thread.) Let's consider a 172. I've heard (though I don't know if this is
right) that the critical AoA for 172s is somewhere around 15-18 degrees.
Looking at the diagram in the POH, I see the wing chord at an angle of about
20 degrees to a line tangent to the underside of the main wheels and the
tail. So there seems to be room for a stalled landing--especially if there's
flap deployment, which increases the camber and AoA even further. Or am I
missing something here?

--Gary


  #3  
Old July 3rd 05, 12:18 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
Pete, what are the numbers on that?


Having accidently scraped the tail on the runway without stalling the
airplane, I have emperical evidence of that fact. Keep in mind also that
the stalling AOA while in ground effect is not the same as that at altitude.

Pete


  #4  
Old July 3rd 05, 03:01 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Duniho wrote:

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...

Pete, what are the numbers on that?



Having accidently scraped the tail on the runway without stalling the
airplane, I have emperical evidence of that fact. Keep in mind also that
the stalling AOA while in ground effect is not the same as that at altitude.


What aircraft type? Sure, if you fly along low with sufficient airspeed
and then yank back on the yoke, I'm not surprised that you could get a
tail strike. However, if you fly inches above the runway and hold the
plane off as the airspeed decays, you can get the yoke all the way back
and the stall horn on just a second before touchdown. I've done it many
times and this is the way my instructor taught me to make virtually
every landing, even crosswind landings in light winds.


Matt
  #5  
Old July 3rd 05, 03:33 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
[...] you can get the yoke all the way back and the stall horn on just a
second before touchdown.


If the stall horn is on only a second before touchdown, you have not stalled
the airplane. The stall horn sounds well before you reach the stalling
angle of attack.


  #6  
Old July 3rd 05, 07:07 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Duniho wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

[...] you can get the yoke all the way back and the stall horn on just a
second before touchdown.



If the stall horn is on only a second before touchdown, you have not stalled
the airplane. The stall horn sounds well before you reach the stalling
angle of attack.


True, but only a few knots above in the Cessna's I've flown 150 - 182.
If you keep smoothly pulling back the yoke, the airspeed will bleed into
stall territory very shortly after you get a full stall horn.


Matt
  #7  
Old July 3rd 05, 08:06 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
True, but only a few knots above in the Cessna's I've flown 150 - 182.


Per certification rules, the stall warning must occur AT LEAST 5 knots prior
to stall. In my experience, it commonly occurs with an even greater margin.

If you keep smoothly pulling back the yoke, the airspeed will bleed into
stall territory very shortly after you get a full stall horn.


No, it won't. The airplane will settle onto the runway before you stall.
You have to move the yoke pretty sharply to keep lift equal to weight at
that airspeed.

Pete


  #8  
Old July 2nd 05, 10:04 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Duniho wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

True, it is just the wing that is stalling. At the onset of stall the
airplane will settle very smoothly to the runway assuming that the wheels
are very close when the stall occurs.



You really should have gone and read this whole thread before reviving it.
This trail has been worn quite smooth already, and you're on the wrong side
of correctness with respect to the possibility of a literal "full-stall
landing".


That sometimes happens when you come back from vacatoin.


You somehow seem to think that you can let the airplane down more
gradually using elevator while at a higher speed than what occurs when the
wing stalls. This simply isn't the case in most airplanes. When the wing
stalls, the lost of list is fairly dramatic, but it still takes time for
the airplane to accelerate downward. If you are within inches of the
runway, this will set you onto the ground very gently. Few pilots can do
a more gently touchdown using elevator control alone.



You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while "within
inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the ground first.


In some airplanes, yes, but in many, no.


It is obvious that you weren't taught full-stall landings (by that I mean
having the control wheel full-aft and the stall horn blaring at the moment
of touchdown) and don't know how they are done or how good the results can
be when done properly.



Obvious? What's obvious is that you are making statements without having
the knowledge to back them up. It's also obvious you don't have the good
sense to avoid insulting someone else's flying ability without ensuring
first that you have a clue about what you're talking about.

I can't vouch for George's flying ability, but there's nothing in his posts
to suggest it's anything less than stellar. Your denigration of his flying
skills was completely unjustified.


I didn't denigrate his flying skills, simply suggested that there is a
skill he wasn't taught. Nothing to be ashamed of about that and it
certainly isn't an insult. I wasn't taught to do Immelmanns, and saying
I can't do one is hardly an insult, just a fact.


You should find an instructor competent in this area and take a lesson or
two. It will be both fun and enlightening.



Take your own advice.


I do at least once a year.

Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Piloting 0 September 22nd 04 07:13 PM
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? Andrew Gideon Piloting 6 February 3rd 04 03:01 PM
Flight instructors as Charter Pilots C J Campbell Piloting 6 January 24th 04 07:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.