![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
... True, it is just the wing that is stalling. At the onset of stall the airplane will settle very smoothly to the runway assuming that the wheels are very close when the stall occurs. You really should have gone and read this whole thread before reviving it. This trail has been worn quite smooth already, and you're on the wrong side of correctness with respect to the possibility of a literal "full-stall landing". You somehow seem to think that you can let the airplane down more gradually using elevator while at a higher speed than what occurs when the wing stalls. This simply isn't the case in most airplanes. When the wing stalls, the lost of list is fairly dramatic, but it still takes time for the airplane to accelerate downward. If you are within inches of the runway, this will set you onto the ground very gently. Few pilots can do a more gently touchdown using elevator control alone. You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while "within inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the ground first. It is obvious that you weren't taught full-stall landings (by that I mean having the control wheel full-aft and the stall horn blaring at the moment of touchdown) and don't know how they are done or how good the results can be when done properly. Obvious? What's obvious is that you are making statements without having the knowledge to back them up. It's also obvious you don't have the good sense to avoid insulting someone else's flying ability without ensuring first that you have a clue about what you're talking about. I can't vouch for George's flying ability, but there's nothing in his posts to suggest it's anything less than stellar. Your denigration of his flying skills was completely unjustified. You should find an instructor competent in this area and take a lesson or two. It will be both fun and enlightening. Take your own advice. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
... You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while "within inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the ground first. Pete, what are the numbers on that? (Sorry if I missed it earlier in the thread.) Let's consider a 172. I've heard (though I don't know if this is right) that the critical AoA for 172s is somewhere around 15-18 degrees. Looking at the diagram in the POH, I see the wing chord at an angle of about 20 degrees to a line tangent to the underside of the main wheels and the tail. So there seems to be room for a stalled landing--especially if there's flap deployment, which increases the camber and AoA even further. Or am I missing something here? --Gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
... Pete, what are the numbers on that? Having accidently scraped the tail on the runway without stalling the airplane, I have emperical evidence of that fact. Keep in mind also that the stalling AOA while in ground effect is not the same as that at altitude. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... Pete, what are the numbers on that? Having accidently scraped the tail on the runway without stalling the airplane, I have emperical evidence of that fact. Keep in mind also that the stalling AOA while in ground effect is not the same as that at altitude. What aircraft type? Sure, if you fly along low with sufficient airspeed and then yank back on the yoke, I'm not surprised that you could get a tail strike. However, if you fly inches above the runway and hold the plane off as the airspeed decays, you can get the yoke all the way back and the stall horn on just a second before touchdown. I've done it many times and this is the way my instructor taught me to make virtually every landing, even crosswind landings in light winds. Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
... [...] you can get the yoke all the way back and the stall horn on just a second before touchdown. If the stall horn is on only a second before touchdown, you have not stalled the airplane. The stall horn sounds well before you reach the stalling angle of attack. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... [...] you can get the yoke all the way back and the stall horn on just a second before touchdown. If the stall horn is on only a second before touchdown, you have not stalled the airplane. The stall horn sounds well before you reach the stalling angle of attack. True, but only a few knots above in the Cessna's I've flown 150 - 182. If you keep smoothly pulling back the yoke, the airspeed will bleed into stall territory very shortly after you get a full stall horn. Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
... True, but only a few knots above in the Cessna's I've flown 150 - 182. Per certification rules, the stall warning must occur AT LEAST 5 knots prior to stall. In my experience, it commonly occurs with an even greater margin. If you keep smoothly pulling back the yoke, the airspeed will bleed into stall territory very shortly after you get a full stall horn. No, it won't. The airplane will settle onto the runway before you stall. You have to move the yoke pretty sharply to keep lift equal to weight at that airspeed. Pete |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... True, it is just the wing that is stalling. At the onset of stall the airplane will settle very smoothly to the runway assuming that the wheels are very close when the stall occurs. You really should have gone and read this whole thread before reviving it. This trail has been worn quite smooth already, and you're on the wrong side of correctness with respect to the possibility of a literal "full-stall landing". That sometimes happens when you come back from vacatoin. You somehow seem to think that you can let the airplane down more gradually using elevator while at a higher speed than what occurs when the wing stalls. This simply isn't the case in most airplanes. When the wing stalls, the lost of list is fairly dramatic, but it still takes time for the airplane to accelerate downward. If you are within inches of the runway, this will set you onto the ground very gently. Few pilots can do a more gently touchdown using elevator control alone. You cannot achieve a pitch angle sufficient to stall the wing while "within inches of the runway". The tail of the airplane will hit the ground first. In some airplanes, yes, but in many, no. It is obvious that you weren't taught full-stall landings (by that I mean having the control wheel full-aft and the stall horn blaring at the moment of touchdown) and don't know how they are done or how good the results can be when done properly. Obvious? What's obvious is that you are making statements without having the knowledge to back them up. It's also obvious you don't have the good sense to avoid insulting someone else's flying ability without ensuring first that you have a clue about what you're talking about. I can't vouch for George's flying ability, but there's nothing in his posts to suggest it's anything less than stellar. Your denigration of his flying skills was completely unjustified. I didn't denigrate his flying skills, simply suggested that there is a skill he wasn't taught. Nothing to be ashamed of about that and it certainly isn't an insult. I wasn't taught to do Immelmanns, and saying I can't do one is hardly an insult, just a fact. You should find an instructor competent in this area and take a lesson or two. It will be both fun and enlightening. Take your own advice. I do at least once a year. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
Flight instructors as Charter Pilots | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | January 24th 04 07:51 AM |