![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message .net... This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which results from the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type snow results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are snowing a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them. The smaller droplets being the more dangerous. Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces? Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) What is "rudder reversal"? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) What is "rudder reversal"? Rudder reversal is a when the pilot commands rudder in one direction and the airplane reacts as though opposite rudder was commanded. In icing conditions, small GA aircraft are especially suseptable to flow seperation due to icing of tail surfaces. Flow seperation is a known cause of "rudder reversal". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane
and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for beyond the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow separation. Mike MU-2 "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message .net... This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which results from the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type snow results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are snowing a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them. The smaller droplets being the more dangerous. Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces? Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for beyond the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow separation. I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message .net... This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which results from the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type snow results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are snowing a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them. The smaller droplets being the more dangerous. Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces? Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, but you are recalling it backwards.
Mike MU-2 "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message news ![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for beyond the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow separation. I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message .net... This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which results from the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type snow results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are snowing a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them. The smaller droplets being the more dangerous. Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces? Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... Sorry, but you are recalling it backwards. Could be, maybe I'll dig out the URL later. Mike MU-2 "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message news ![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for beyond the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow separation. I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom S." wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message .net... This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which results from the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type snow results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are snowing a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them. The smaller droplets being the more dangerous. Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces? Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" writes:
I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject. Here's the poop from the weather study guide for my IFR training: The size of the droplets and the frequency with which the strike the aircraft are important because the character of the ice depends on whether or not each drop freezes completely before another drop strikes the same spot. If the droplets pile rapidly on each other before being completely frozen, the unfrozen parts mingle and spread out before freezing. If the droplets freeze completely before being hit by another droplet, a large amount of air is trapped causing the ice to be opaque and brittle. and later, Because of the low adhesive properties of rime, it is generally readily removed by de-icing equipment. and CLEAR ICE - This type of ice has high adhesive and cohesive properties. Unlike rime, it can spread from the leading edges, and in severe cases may cover the whole surface of the aircraft. (From the Canadian Forces Air Command Weather Manual, Chapter 9.) Of course, the adhesive properties are irrelevant when I don't have deicing equipment anyway, but the spread still matters. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The National Lake Eutrophication Survey 1971-1973 | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 18 | June 16th 04 02:27 AM |
Which sport/acro biplane from plans? | Mr.Twistair | Home Built | 15 | October 6th 03 04:53 AM |