A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Great Lakes lake effect snow



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 03, 04:03 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
.net...
This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which

results
from
the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type

snow
results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are

snowing
a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them.


The smaller droplets being the more dangerous.

Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces?


Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)


  #2  
Old October 7th 03, 04:10 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)



What is "rudder reversal"?

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #3  
Old October 7th 03, 04:22 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)


What is "rudder reversal"?


Rudder reversal is a when the pilot commands rudder in one direction and the
airplane reacts as though opposite rudder was commanded. In icing
conditions, small GA aircraft are especially suseptable to flow seperation
due to icing of tail surfaces. Flow seperation is a known cause of "rudder
reversal".


  #4  
Old October 7th 03, 03:56 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane
and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for beyond
the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow
separation.

Mike
MU-2


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
.net...
This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which

results
from
the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type

snow
results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that are
snowing
a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them.

The smaller droplets being the more dangerous.

Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces?


Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)




  #5  
Old October 8th 03, 03:06 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the airplane
and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for

beyond
the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow
separation.


I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a
pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
.net...
This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which

results
from
the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet" type

snow
results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that

are
snowing
a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them.

The smaller droplets being the more dangerous.

Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces?


Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely

to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)






  #6  
Old October 8th 03, 03:45 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, but you are recalling it backwards.

Mike
MU-2


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
news

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the

airplane
and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for

beyond
the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow
separation.


I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives a
pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
.net...
This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type which
results
from
the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet"

type
snow
results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds that

are
snowing
a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them.

The smaller droplets being the more dangerous.

Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces?

Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more likely

to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)








  #7  
Old October 8th 03, 03:53 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
Sorry, but you are recalling it backwards.


Could be, maybe I'll dig out the URL later.


Mike
MU-2


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
news

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
You have it backwards, large droplets are more likely to hit the

airplane
and form ice. Additionally large droplet ice is more lilkely to for

beyond
the protected surfaces into ridges and horns which can cause airflow
separation.


I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He gives

a
pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
.net...
This is true if the snow being produced is the flake type

which
results
from
the direct crystalization of water vapor. The round "pellet"

type
snow
results from the freezing of liquid cloud droplets. Clouds

that
are
snowing
a lot of pellet type snow have a lot of ice in them.

The smaller droplets being the more dangerous.

Rime ice? Why? That part breaks more easily from surfaces?

Icing is a statistical phenomenon and smaller droplets are more

likely
to
form ice on wing and rudder surfaces. (ie rudder reversal)










  #8  
Old October 8th 03, 02:19 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" writes:

I got my information from John Brownlee FAA flight test pilot. He
gives a pretty interesting power point presentation on the subject.


Here's the poop from the weather study guide for my IFR training:

The size of the droplets and the frequency with which the strike the
aircraft are important because the character of the ice depends on
whether or not each drop freezes completely before another drop
strikes the same spot. If the droplets pile rapidly on each other
before being completely frozen, the unfrozen parts mingle and spread
out before freezing. If the droplets freeze completely before being
hit by another droplet, a large amount of air is trapped causing the
ice to be opaque and brittle.

and later,

Because of the low adhesive properties of rime, it is generally
readily removed by de-icing equipment.

and

CLEAR ICE - This type of ice has high adhesive and cohesive
properties. Unlike rime, it can spread from the leading edges, and
in severe cases may cover the whole surface of the aircraft.

(From the Canadian Forces Air Command Weather Manual, Chapter 9.) Of
course, the adhesive properties are irrelevant when I don't have
deicing equipment anyway, but the spread still matters.


All the best,


David
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The National Lake Eutrophication Survey 1971-1973 Badwater Bill Home Built 18 June 16th 04 02:27 AM
Which sport/acro biplane from plans? Mr.Twistair Home Built 15 October 6th 03 04:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.