![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Johnston" wrote in message news:dzZo7CxomoOm-pn2-1IU6gvmrdIOd@localhost... On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:59:24 UTC, M B wrote: Is there any commonly known way to test a weak link non-destructively (other than launching a glider)? The Tost system uses two in parallel, one slightly longer than the other. Whoever hooks up the glider should always check that both links are intact and that only one is taking the load. Ian To expand on what Ian wrote, the parallel weak-link system places only the primary weak-link under load with a unloaded spare in place to take the load should the first one fail below its rated strength as a result of fatigue from repeated load cycles. If the failure is due to an overload, the spare will fail a millisecond after the primary and the glider will be protected from excessive cable force. If the person hooking up the glider to the winch line shows these weak links to the pilot, a crack in the primary will be obvious and can be quickly replaced with a new one of the correct strength for the glider. The Tost weak-link system is very well thought out and correct weak-link color is universally referenced in German glider handbooks. It should be used in every winch operation. I find it very comforting to know that the glider will be protected from excessive loads while the weak-link itself is backed up by a full strength spare. Using either over or understrength weak-links is very hazardous. Bill Daniels |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:05:20 UTC, "Bill Daniels"
wrote: If the person hooking up the glider to the winch line shows these weak links to the pilot, a crack in the primary will be obvious and can be quickly replaced with a new one of the correct strength for the glider. It's also easy to check that under light tension one link is taking the load and one is free to rattle around, which is an easy way to make sure that the primary link hasn't stretched, or got elongated holes. The downside is that the metal holder for the links does tend to get rammed full of mud on grass airfields. Ian -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |