A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nimbus 4DT accident 31 July 2000 in Spain.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 05, 07:05 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ian Johnston" wrote in message
news:dzZo7CxomoOm-pn2-1IU6gvmrdIOd@localhost...
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:59:24 UTC, M B
wrote:

Is there any commonly known way to test a weak
link non-destructively (other than launching a glider)?


The Tost system uses two in parallel, one slightly longer than the
other. Whoever hooks up the glider should always check that both links
are intact and that only one is taking the load.

Ian

To expand on what Ian wrote, the parallel weak-link system places only the
primary weak-link under load with a unloaded spare in place to take the load
should the first one fail below its rated strength as a result of fatigue
from repeated load cycles. If the failure is due to an overload, the spare
will fail a millisecond after the primary and the glider will be protected
from excessive cable force.

If the person hooking up the glider to the winch line shows these weak links
to the pilot, a crack in the primary will be obvious and can be quickly
replaced with a new one of the correct strength for the glider.

The Tost weak-link system is very well thought out and correct weak-link
color is universally referenced in German glider handbooks. It should be
used in every winch operation. I find it very comforting to know that the
glider will be protected from excessive loads while the weak-link itself is
backed up by a full strength spare.

Using either over or understrength weak-links is very hazardous.

Bill Daniels

  #2  
Old July 5th 05, 10:12 PM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:05:20 UTC, "Bill Daniels"
wrote:

If the person hooking up the glider to the winch line shows these weak links
to the pilot, a crack in the primary will be obvious and can be quickly
replaced with a new one of the correct strength for the glider.


It's also easy to check that under light tension one link is taking
the load and one is free to rattle around, which is an easy way to
make sure that the primary link hasn't stretched, or got elongated
holes. The downside is that the metal holder for the links does tend
to get rammed full of mud on grass airfields.

Ian


--

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.