A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nimbus 4DT accident 31 July 2000 in Spain.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 05, 10:16 PM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:24:21 UTC, (Andreas Maurer)
wrote:

As Bert already stated: As long as you stay within the safe speed
range, there is no way to exceed the stress limits of the glider -
simply there isn't enough lift available.


Um, must check, but am pretty sure angle of attack influences lift as
well...

Besides: I've never seen an ASW-20 break a weak link on my home
airfield. We were using the blue ones for the 20.


So why would anyone fly with a 33% over strength link?

Would you fly with 250kg of unofficial extra ballast in the fuselage?

That's not the point since this "unofficial ballast" never shows up if
the speed is kept in the safe range.


Unless the glider hits a gust, or the pilot pulls back too hard, or
the throttle of the winch suddenly shoots open or ...

One example of how a designer got it wrong is the SF-34:
Officially the only allowed weak link is the blue one. Unfortunately
with this weak link it is nearly impossible to complete a winch launch
- the weak link fails in the moment the glider starts to accelerate.
Solution: a stronger weak link, and careful speed control.


It's been ages since I did a winch launch in an SF34 and I really
can't remember much about it, but surely in that case the manufacturer
should be approached about changing the link officially, and issuing a
strengthening modification if required?

I wonder if Centrair changed this on the Alliance 34? I must check the
handbook - we have one at my current (all aerotow!) club.

Ian
--

  #2  
Old July 6th 05, 07:49 AM
Bert Willing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you fly at max allowed speed at Ca(max), even a gust cannot produce more
lift.

Just to get your numbers straightened out: The wing attachement is designed
for a maximum load of 5.3g, that equivalents in the case of an ASW20 beyond
1000kg of non lift producing parts (which are around 200 kg of mass).

Ad it's pretty clear that if you don't use a weak link, you need to watch
your speed _and_ your angle of attack.


--
Bert Willing

ASW20 "TW"


"Ian Johnston" a écrit dans le message de news:
dzZo7CxomoOm-pn2-sdKTFDfjQBvY@localhost...
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:24:21 UTC, (Andreas Maurer)
wrote:

As Bert already stated: As long as you stay within the safe speed
range, there is no way to exceed the stress limits of the glider -
simply there isn't enough lift available.


Um, must check, but am pretty sure angle of attack influences lift as
well...



  #3  
Old July 6th 05, 12:15 PM
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 5 Jul 2005 21:16:28 GMT, "Ian Johnston"
wrote:


As Bert already stated: As long as you stay within the safe speed
range, there is no way to exceed the stress limits of the glider -
simply there isn't enough lift available.


Um, must check, but am pretty sure angle of attack influences lift as
well...


Indeed... but if you stay within the allowed speed range, you'll get a
stall if you pull too hard instead of overstressing the glider.


Besides: I've never seen an ASW-20 break a weak link on my home
airfield. We were using the blue ones for the 20.


So why would anyone fly with a 33% over strength link?


Ask Bert - he's got his reasons!


Unless the glider hits a gust, or the pilot pulls back too hard, or
the throttle of the winch suddenly shoots open or ...


Nope.
Either of these cases results either in a stall (pulling back too
hard) or overspeed... but does not lead to overstress. If you leave
the safe speed range, you pull the release... problem solved
immediately.


It's been ages since I did a winch launch in an SF34 and I really
can't remember much about it, but surely in that case the manufacturer
should be approached about changing the link officially, and issuing a
strengthening modification if required?


Indeed... but nothing has happened.

I wonder if Centrair changed this on the Alliance 34? I must check the
handbook - we have one at my current (all aerotow!) club.


Please do - I'd be interested if it's different for the Alliance 34.




Bye
Andreas
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.