A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Garmin 396



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 10th 05, 09:54 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Goodish wrote:

That all being said, Garmin produces a very good, polished navigation
system that is hard to beat--in my opinion, none of the PDA-based
software products does navigation as cleanly.


That's true, but I still want a feature available via the PDA route and not
via the Garmin route: a backup AI. But then I fly club airplanes with 430s
installed, so when I think "handheld GPS" I'm thinking "backup"...and I
want as much backup as possible.

- Andrew

  #2  
Old July 10th 05, 10:18 PM
Jonathan Goodish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ine.com,
Andrew Gideon wrote:
That all being said, Garmin produces a very good, polished navigation
system that is hard to beat--in my opinion, none of the PDA-based
software products does navigation as cleanly.


That's true, but I still want a feature available via the PDA route and not
via the Garmin route: a backup AI. But then I fly club airplanes with 430s
installed, so when I think "handheld GPS" I'm thinking "backup"...and I
want as much backup as possible.



Honestly, if I had a 430/530 or other approach-certified GPS in my
panel, I don't know that I'd even invest in a hand held GPS. It might
be very nice to have your Garmin 396 interfaced with your 430/530,
GTX330, and SL30/SL40, but at some point I think the gadgetry reaches
the point of diminishing returns.



JKG
  #3  
Old July 11th 05, 12:35 AM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Goodish wrote:
Honestly, if I had a 430/530 or other approach-certified GPS in my
panel, I don't know that I'd even invest in a hand held GPS. It might
be very nice to have your Garmin 396 interfaced with your 430/530,
GTX330, and SL30/SL40, but at some point I think the gadgetry reaches
the point of diminishing returns.


Garmin 396... WAAS capable
Garmin 430/530... WAAS ??? (someday. maybe.)
  #4  
Old July 11th 05, 01:59 AM
Jonathan Goodish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
john smith wrote:
Honestly, if I had a 430/530 or other approach-certified GPS in my
panel, I don't know that I'd even invest in a hand held GPS. It might
be very nice to have your Garmin 396 interfaced with your 430/530,
GTX330, and SL30/SL40, but at some point I think the gadgetry reaches
the point of diminishing returns.


Garmin 396... WAAS capable
Garmin 430/530... WAAS ??? (someday. maybe.)


Yes, I understand, which is one of the reasons that I DON'T have a 430
in my panel. I'm not sure how much WAAS buys you with a hand held.


JKG
  #5  
Old July 12th 05, 05:06 AM
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Garmin 396... WAAS capable
Garmin 430/530... WAAS ??? (someday. maybe.)


Handheld = not IFR approved.
Panel mount GNS 430/530 allows VOR, GPS and ILS approaches.

Ron Lee

  #6  
Old July 13th 05, 04:31 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Lee" wrote

Handheld = not IFR approved.
Panel mount GNS 430/530 allows VOR, GPS and ILS approaches.


Hypothetical situation.

A guy is on an IFR cross country flight, in and out of IFR conditions. His
latest weather reports indicate that his destination has ceilings that might
be 1000 and 1/2 mile, but also might be better. An alternate within his
comfortable fuel range is mostly clear. His departure airport is also
mostly clear.

Halfway there, his IFR approved GPS suddenly craps out, but his 396 with XM
is doing great, and has plenty of power.

What should he do?
--
Jim in NC

  #7  
Old July 13th 05, 05:09 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Halfway there, his IFR approved GPS suddenly craps out, but his 396 with XM
is doing great, and has plenty of power.


What other IFR approved navigation equipment does he have?

If he has VOR, and there's a VOR approach at the destination, I see no
reason not to continue on and shoot the VOR approach with the IFR
certified VOR equipment on the aircraft, using the handheld GPS for
situational awareness.

Jose
--
Nothing takes longer than a shortcut.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #8  
Old July 13th 05, 08:02 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jose" wrote

What other IFR approved navigation equipment does he have?

If he has VOR, and there's a VOR approach at the destination, I see no
reason not to continue on and shoot the VOR approach with the IFR
certified VOR equipment on the aircraft, using the handheld GPS for
situational awareness.


His destination and all options only have GPS instrument approaches, or all
his other IFR instruments crapped out.

What he is thinking of doing, is not telling anyone that his other stuff
crapped out, and go ahead shooting a GPS approach to high minimums, and if
the weather does not let him decide early to go visual, go missed.
--
Jim in NC

  #9  
Old July 13th 05, 01:36 PM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The best solution is to fly to VFR.

If he still has a working com, an acceptable alternative is to fly an ASR
approach at the destination if that is available.

Using the handheld for an approach is acceptable only as a last resort of no
other options remain; that is not the case here since there is an available
alternate with clear weather.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


  #10  
Old July 12th 05, 05:07 AM
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have a GNS 430 plus Airmap 100. If the GNS 430 has a problem I have
a redundant GPS unit.

Ron Lee


Honestly, if I had a 430/530 or other approach-certified GPS in my
panel, I don't know that I'd even invest in a hand held GPS. It might
be very nice to have your Garmin 396 interfaced with your 430/530,
GTX330, and SL30/SL40, but at some point I think the gadgetry reaches
the point of diminishing returns.

JKG


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS Rhett Piloting 10 March 23rd 05 01:16 AM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS Rhett Products 10 April 29th 04 06:57 AM
Garmin DME arc weidnress Dave Touretzky Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 2nd 03 02:04 AM
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued Val Christian Piloting 14 August 20th 03 09:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.