![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
I thought that for /G there still needed to be a vor or other nav fix in the route. I generally draw a line between the start AP and the destination and then add a vor in the middle that doesn't increase the distance by much. Gices me two nav checks for redundancy, too. Are you saying that /g can be diredt between APs over several hundred miles with no other fixs? Chuck |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck" wrote in message oups.com... I thought that for /G there still needed to be a vor or other nav fix in the route. I generally draw a line between the start AP and the destination and then add a vor in the middle that doesn't increase the distance by much. Gices me two nav checks for redundancy, too. Are you saying that /g can be diredt between APs over several hundred miles with no other fixs? You don't even have to be /G. IFR flight off-airways and beyond normal navaid distance/altitude limits just requires radar monitoring by ATC. Now, if you're going to a rather small airport hundreds of miles away there may be a flight data processing problem. The NAS computer serving the departure airport may not know where the destination airport is. You can get around that by filing a few waypoints based on H-class VORs that fall on your route, that will also help ATC visualize the route. Or you can just file the destination coordinates as an intermediate fix. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
link.net... =20 "Chuck" wrote in message oups.com... I thought that for /G there still needed to be a vor or other nav fix in the route. I generally draw a line between the start AP and the destination and then add a vor in the middle that doesn't increase = the distance by much. Gices me two nav checks for redundancy, too. Are you saying that /g can be diredt between APs over several hundred = miles with no other fixs? =20 You don't even have to be /G. IFR flight off-airways and beyond = normal=20 navaid distance/altitude limits just requires radar monitoring by ATC. = Now,=20 if you're going to a rather small airport hundreds of miles away there = may=20 be a flight data processing problem. The NAS computer serving the = departure=20 airport may not know where the destination airport is. You can get = around=20 that by filing a few waypoints based on H-class VORs that fall on your = route, that will also help ATC visualize the route. Or you can just = file=20 the destination coordinates as an intermediate fix.=20 Sometimes, but not always, when I file direct to a distant point, even an H-class VOR, I'll be cleared first to a nearby fix, then as = filed. I usually make a note of that nearby fix, and include it in subsequent = trips. I figure the departure controllers prefer that, and it's OK by me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Duat Graphics | Slick | Piloting | 0 | January 23rd 05 01:35 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
DTC DUAT | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | June 5th 04 03:23 PM |
Picking Optimal Altitudes | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 8th 04 02:59 PM |