![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... No, one property of the route WANTED by Potomac approach is that it not go through there. Who's wagging the what? Well, since Potomac approach IS going to get what they WANT, it follows that what is NEEDED is a route that does not go through Potomac approach. Whether they are fixed or not is not information readily available to the pilot (there are plenty of examples of controller boundaries that are not fixed). Cite them. And the pilot =does= need to know what the boundaries are in order to make an intellegent decision as to whether to go around it or do something else. Why doesn't he ask? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whether they are fixed or not is not information readily available to the
pilot (there are plenty of examples of controller boundaries that are not fixed). Cite them. The boundaries between what controllers handle what flight on what frequencies for example, which depends on LOA and the winds. The internal boundaries of airspace that is sometimes approach and sometiems center. And if I'm citing them incorrectly, I know some stuff like that has been discussed here, and I bet you remember what it really is and could fill me in. It's one of the reasons that these boundaries are not shown on charts - they keep changing, even as to altitudes. If I were a controller, I'd know what they are. I'm just a pilot, so I dial the frequencies I'm handed off to, and everyone's happy. And the pilot =does= need to know what the boundaries are in order to make an intellegent decision as to whether to go around it or do something else. Why doesn't he ask? I suppose if it were me, I would ask. But it would take me a moment or two to realize that this is what they are expecting. I guess I'm just too used to getting reroutes I can accept or reject, rather than "can't go there, try again". Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, since Potomac approach IS going to get what they WANT, it follows that
what is NEEDED is a route that does not go through Potomac approach. .... and Potomac should not get what they WANT... it's the pilot that should get what they want. That's what approach is for. Approach should get what they NEED in order to give the pilot what he WANTS. "Refusing" to accept you is different from "IS UNABLE" to accept you. And that is where my dander got caught. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flap handle activated Climb/Cruise switching | Andy Smielkiewicz | Soaring | 5 | March 14th 05 04:54 AM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
G103 Acro airbrake handle | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 12 | January 18th 04 11:51 PM |
How do you handle your EFB in the cockpit? | greg | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 17th 03 03:47 AM |
Need door handle for 1959 Cessna 175 | Paul Millner | Owning | 0 | July 4th 03 07:36 PM |