A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

P-51D



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 18th 05, 11:19 PM
gregg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Duniho wrote:


What's insane is thinking that it's for some reason important to preserve
these planes. As I already pointed out, if they were so important to
preserve, we shouldn't have been building them to be destroyed in the
first place.


Pete


Yuo pointed it out, yes, but it was then, and is now, a non sequitur.

Value of things can change with time. It's not impossible to take something
that was throwaway at one point and have it's value redefined at another
point. Especially if it became historically important and there are only a
veyr few left.

Often when something is built one doesn't realize how important,
historically, it will turn out to be.

Very few things were built to last forever. That doesn't mean that when
there are only a few left, they shouldn't increase in value. civil War
swords were made by the thousands. They are more valuable now than they
were then.

Lots of furniture was built in the 1700's. Much of it wasn't expected to
last forever. Those few pieces that still exist command huge prices. A
simple dough box - a utilitarian piece of gear - made in the 1700's is now
very expensive if it's in decent shape.


--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

  #2  
Old July 19th 05, 02:23 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"gregg" wrote in message
...
Value of things can change with time. It's not impossible to take
something
that was throwaway at one point and have it's value redefined at another
point. Especially if it became historically important and there are only a
veyr few left.


If and when the P-51 actually becomes so valuable that it is "historically
important" for them to cease flying, then they will cease. This will happen
because those who deem it so "historically important" will buy all of the
flyable ones and ground them.

Until then, they obviously are not so precious that we cannot afford to have
them flying, even in air races (as if that were somehow more hazardous to
the fleet than other types of flying).

[...]
Very few things were built to last forever. That doesn't mean that when
there are only a few left, they shouldn't increase in value. civil War
swords were made by the thousands. They are more valuable now than they
were then.


Only to people who irrationally place such a high value on them. Many
people wouldn't pay even a fraction of the time-adjusted cost of production
of a Civil War era sword.

To those people who think the P-51 shouldn't be flying: buy your own and
ground it, if you think it's so important.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.