![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
"jamin3508" wrote: My currency just ran out last month and I was wondering within the next six months Im allowed to have a safty pilot with me or do I need a instructor to perform the six approches holds and tracking? As long as you operate under VFR, you can get yourself current again with just a safety pilot (unless the safety pilot is able and willing to act as PIC under IFR). At which point he's not a safety pilot, he's the pilot in command. Safety pilots only have regulatory menaing for simulated instrument flight. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:32:06 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote: Roy Smith wrote: "jamin3508" wrote: My currency just ran out last month and I was wondering within the next six months Im allowed to have a safty pilot with me or do I need a instructor to perform the six approches holds and tracking? As long as you operate under VFR, you can get yourself current again with just a safety pilot (unless the safety pilot is able and willing to act as PIC under IFR). At which point he's not a safety pilot, he's the pilot in command. Safety pilots only have regulatory menaing for simulated instrument flight. Isn't that what Roy already said by saying "willing to act as PIC"? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote:
At which point he's not a safety pilot, he's the pilot in command. Safety pilots only have regulatory menaing for simulated instrument flight. Isn't that what Roy already said by saying "willing to act as PIC"? Sorry, just being overly pedantic. When he "willing acts as PIC in IFR conditions" he isn't a safety pilot anymore. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:11:29 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote: Peter Clark wrote: At which point he's not a safety pilot, he's the pilot in command. Safety pilots only have regulatory menaing for simulated instrument flight. Isn't that what Roy already said by saying "willing to act as PIC"? Sorry, just being overly pedantic. When he "willing acts as PIC in IFR conditions" he isn't a safety pilot anymore. But if someone else is PIC, can the "copilot" count the approaches toward currency? vince norris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But if someone else is PIC, can the "copilot" count the approaches
toward currency? Yes. That is, if by "copilot" you mean the pilot flying - the one with his hands on the controls, whether or not he has the final authority for the flight. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And at which point you can no longer log instrument time/maneuvers towards
currency because the safety pilot is now PIC. The obvious exception is if the safety pilot happens to be a CFII. Jim At which point he's not a safety pilot, he's the pilot in command. Safety pilots only have regulatory menaing for simulated instrument flight. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And at which point you can no longer log instrument time/maneuvers towards
currency because the safety pilot is now PIC. The obvious exception is if the safety pilot happens to be a CFII. Incorrect. The safety pilot is PIC, but this does not preclude the pilot flying from logging instrument time: 61.57(c) (1) For the purpose of obtaining instrument experience in an aircraft, performed and logged under actual or simulated instrument conditions, either in flight in the appropriate category of aircraft for the instrument privileges sought or in a flight simulator... -- (i) At least six instrument approaches; (ii) Holding procedures; and (iii) Intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigation systems. Note that there is no requirement to be acting as pilot in command when the approaches are performed or logged, nor event to log the time as PIC (although one can, as per 61.51e). Logging requirements follow: 61.51(c) Logging of pilot time. The pilot time described in this section may be used to: (2) Satisfy the recent flight experience requirements of this part. (g) Logging instrument flight time. (1) A person may log instrument time only for that flight time when the person operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments under actual or simulated instrument flight conditions. Note that there is no requirement that the person be instrument current, or actually act as PIC, in order to log instrument time. One need not even be rated in category, class, and type. A copilot flying an approach in an airliner for which he lacks a type rating can still use that approach for airplane currency, even though he only logs SIC time (even in a single, since the recent experience requirements are based on category only, not category, class, and type) Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Currency Rule for Homebuilt? | Gig Giacona | Home Built | 14 | May 18th 05 02:23 PM |
Real-world IFR currency | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | March 23rd 05 04:19 PM |
currency | Rick McPherson | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | November 14th 04 01:55 AM |
regaining night currency but not alone | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 28th 04 02:08 PM |
Infrequent flying & IFR currency | Marty Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | August 22nd 03 10:45 AM |