A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

No SID in clearance, fly it anyway?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 03, 01:34 PM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Esres wrote in message . ..
That's not always the case. And to make matters worse, the pilot
has no way of knowing without direct knowledge.


When would that not be the case? And if it were the case, the pilot
must certainly know. If you don't hear the words "radar contact"
followed by a heading, then you're not being vectored.


Greg,

Now that I think about it some more, I think the issue is
that some VFR towers (which won't tell you "radar contact")
can relay radar vectors from the radar approach control
which serves them. But sitting on the ground, I have no
way of knowing whether Whatzits Approach meets the criteria
(whatever they are) to provide radar vectors to Podunk Tower.
If I hear "fly heading XXX, intercept the ABC 188 degree
radial" is that a vector or a heading?

Beats me. We've sure gotten headings like that from VFR
towers which I'm pretty durn sure were way too far from
a radar facility to have coverage close to the ground, and
in fact we didn't hear "radar contact" until we were above
3,000 ft. So I don't think they were vectors. They were
headings. OTOH "fly heading XXX" from our local VFR tower
which sits under the STL class B might be vectors. Dunno.

I think the rule has to be, if there's something to hit
and departure instructions don't include the obstacle
DP, Ask.

Cheers,
Sydney
  #2  
Old November 2nd 03, 03:59 PM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

VFR towers (which won't tell you "radar contact") can relay radar
vectors from the radar approach control which serves them.

I can buy the idea of a relayed vector, but the person who provided
the vector still must see you on radar. When the aircraft is sitting
on the ground, approach control can't see it and therefore can't
vector it.


Consider that if you take off with the heading and start to wander
into some obstacle, tower won't be able to do anything about it
(because they won't know) and neither will the approach control until
they get you on radar, which will happen at various altitudes,
depending on where you're departing from.


  #3  
Old November 2nd 03, 05:38 PM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...


Consider that if you take off with the heading and start to wander
into some obstacle, tower won't be able to do anything about it
(because they won't know) and neither will the approach control


That's where the period goes. Approach may know, but may not be able to do
anything about it.

until
they get you on radar, which will happen at various altitudes,
depending on where you're departing from.


Radar coverage and "radar contact" have nothing to do with terrain
clearance, except when above the MVA and a vector is issued. Even then there
can be errors, so it's wisest to always know position relative to terrain.

I believe that there is a HUGE pilot misconception about the level of
assistance for terrain avoidance when departing a towered field.

I have learned to always request and fly ODPs when they exist, no matter
what kind of airport, or weather. It's good practice. I believe that the
same applies for SIDs as a way to reduce the risk of metal to metal contact.



  #4  
Old November 3rd 03, 12:58 AM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Radar coverage and "radar contact" have nothing to do with terrain
clearance, except when above the MVA and a vector is issued. Even then
there can be errors, so it's wisest to always know position relative
to terrain.

Vectors can be issued below MVA in departures and missed approaches.

Otherwise, all ok. ;-)
  #5  
Old November 4th 03, 03:34 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Greg Esres wrote:

Radar coverage and "radar contact" have nothing to do with terrain
clearance, except when above the MVA and a vector is issued. Even then
there can be errors, so it's wisest to always know position relative
to terrain.

Vectors can be issued below MVA in departures and missed approaches.

Otherwise, all ok. ;-)


And, with the restriction that they must see you at or above the MVA
altitude for an adjacent higher MVA sector before they allow you to enter
that higher MVA sector. It doesn't say that in the 7110.65, though, but
when it was rased at ATPAC by pilot groups, the ATC folks said, "Well,
that is just understood."

But, I have an airspace friend at SCT who says there are truly two camps
within the controller ranks about the restrictions on vectors below MVA.

  #6  
Old November 2nd 03, 07:26 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Greg Esres wrote:



I can buy the idea of a relayed vector, but the person who provided
the vector still must see you on radar.


Yes, they have to be able to see you by a certain point after departure
to be allowed to issue vectors in the takeoff clearance.


When the aircraft is sitting
on the ground, approach control can't see it and therefore can't
vector it.


Well we can see aircraft on the ground, though that has nothing to do
with anything.




Consider that if you take off with the heading and start to wander
into some obstacle, tower won't be able to do anything about it
(because they won't know) and neither will the approach control until
they get you on radar, which will happen at various altitudes,
depending on where you're departing from.


In order to get a vector off the ground you have to be seen by the radar
facility within a half mile of the airport. So you can't wander into
anything.

  #7  
Old November 2nd 03, 07:30 PM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
news:UTcpb.88415$e01.290862@attbi_s02...
In order to get a vector off the ground you have to be seen by the radar
facility within a half mile of the airport. So you can't wander into
anything.


Is "proceed on course, contact departure" a vector?


  #8  
Old November 2nd 03, 08:39 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Robert Henry wrote:
"Newps" wrote in message
news:UTcpb.88415$e01.290862@attbi_s02...

In order to get a vector off the ground you have to be seen by the radar
facility within a half mile of the airport. So you can't wander into
anything.



Is "proceed on course, contact departure" a vector?


No. That's a VFR tower instruction. A vector is an actual heading to fly.

  #9  
Old November 2nd 03, 09:25 PM
Robert Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
news:0Ydpb.87662$Tr4.226083@attbi_s03...


Is "proceed on course, contact departure" a vector?


No. That's a VFR tower instruction. A vector is an actual heading to

fly.


And if that course takes you right into a layer of granite, oh well.


  #10  
Old November 3rd 03, 09:04 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
news:0Ydpb.87662$Tr4.226083@attbi_s03...


Robert Henry wrote:
"Newps" wrote in message
news:UTcpb.88415$e01.290862@attbi_s02...

In order to get a vector off the ground you have to be seen by the

radar
facility within a half mile of the airport. So you can't wander into
anything.



Is "proceed on course, contact departure" a vector?


No. That's a VFR tower instruction. A vector is an actual heading to

fly.

Huh!!! And all this time I thought a heading was a "heading", and a heading
and altitude instruction was a "vector".

Tom
"We have vectors, Victor!!".


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approaches with Center Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 104 October 22nd 03 09:42 PM
IFR Routing Toronto to Windsor (CYTZ - CYQG) Rob Pesan Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 7th 03 01:50 PM
required readback on clearance [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 04:33 PM
Picking up a Clearance Airborne Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 03 01:31 AM
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) Badwater Bill Home Built 27 August 21st 03 12:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.