737 off runway, Pearson Toronto

In article ,
says...


I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave



Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you don't
have TV?

Whatever, get a life.

"Greg Farris" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...


I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different
on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave



Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly
on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you
don't
have TV?

In article ,
says...


Whatever, get a life.


Get a TV - or stop whining about what the TV is or isn't reporting!

Greg Farris wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...


I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different
on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave



Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly
on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you don't
have TV?

Dave originally said "news agencies." Maybe he has access to this thing
called the internet.

- Rick

"Rick" wrote in message
...
Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly
on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you
don't
have TV?

Dave originally said "news agencies." Maybe he has access to this thing
called the internet.

- Rick



Yea, like on msnbc. Get a load of what this passenger "lady" has to say.
Being alive and unhurt wasn't enough, maybe she expected a personal escort
to a plush RV with champagne & caviar?

The O2 masks never dropped? Maybe it's because the plane was on the ground?
Yea, lets add some O2 to the resulting fire!

Damn airline got her shoes muddy! Ohhhh, the humanity!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8801366/

Uggh!

Marty,

Get a load of what this passenger "lady" has to say.
Being alive and unhurt wasn't enough, maybe she expected a personal escort
to a plush RV with champagne & caviar?


Well, we're lucky it happened in Canada. Otherwise she would get millions
after her lawyers sued the airline for mental distress or something.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Marty" wrote:

Damn airline got her shoes muddy! Ohhhh, the humanity!


Hee-hee! Good one.

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

Well....

I listened to the 3 networks here (Canada)

CBC, not bad, (They had a cam grew at the airport covering the
storm)

CTV, a little better.... more factual and reasonable..

Global... a joke..They REALLY need help... She couldn't even
get it straight between "Casualities " and "fatalities" ..

(sigh)

(Sorry, but it was really awful)

All in all, a mess, - but someone (many) did some things
right... Emerg crews apparently were at the plane in 50 secs... the
slides worked, and the crew had them launched...

NO fatals......!!!

14 or 24 minor injuries (depending on which network)

Everybody will get to go home..

Air France will need a new 340 however...

Dave


On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:04:08 -0500, "Rick"
wrote:

Greg Farris wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...


I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different
on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave



Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly
on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you don't
have TV?

Dave originally said "news agencies." Maybe he has access to this thing
called the internet.

- Rick

Dave wrote:

Air France will need a new 340 however...

Hi!

I'm not sure of this... Air France was rather in the move of less 340s
and more 777s and 330s (which is, I think a good choice!)

Hope we get the good factual information on the crashfrom the TSB of
Canada soon!

French TV was hardly informative tonight, with the usual 15 minutes of
"impressions" from passengers, people on ground etc...

Cheers

Stanislas


--
remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre
substitute "laposte" to "lesptt" to reach me