A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

737 off runway, Pearson Toronto



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old August 3rd 05, 03:54 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
What is interesting in the case of the KLM aircraft is that the pilot
first
stated PAN-PAN, then continued by saying "Low fuel emergency."

Wouldn't the inclusion of the word "emergency" be the same as a pilot
stating "I am declaring an emergency" and therefore be handled by ATC as
an
emergency?


Saying "pan-pan" already declares an emergency. There are two levels of
emergency--urgency (pan-pan) and distress (mayday). (AIM 6-1-2a)


  #32  
Old August 3rd 05, 03:56 AM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well....

I listened to the 3 networks here (Canada)

CBC, not bad, (They had a cam grew at the airport covering the
storm)

CTV, a little better.... more factual and reasonable..

Global... a joke..They REALLY need help... She couldn't even
get it straight between "Casualities " and "fatalities" ..

(sigh)

(Sorry, but it was really awful)

All in all, a mess, - but someone (many) did some things
right... Emerg crews apparently were at the plane in 50 secs... the
slides worked, and the crew had them launched...

NO fatals......!!!

14 or 24 minor injuries (depending on which network)

Everybody will get to go home..

Air France will need a new 340 however...

Dave


On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:04:08 -0500, "Rick"
wrote:

Greg Farris wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...


I don't have access to TV here, they might be saying something different

on
there.
The news on the website was saying there was lighting in the area, but
nothing about the plane getting struck. (I will check again)

Dave



Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly

on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you don't
have TV?


Dave originally said "news agencies." Maybe he has access to this thing
called the internet.

- Rick


  #33  
Old August 3rd 05, 03:57 AM
Marty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rick" wrote in message
...
Dave - Hello Dave - Wake up Dave!
I'm not interested in commenting on airline accidents in the early hours,
before at least the initial facts are in - but to comment disparagingly

on
what the news are or are not reporting, then to come back and say you
don't
have TV?


Dave originally said "news agencies." Maybe he has access to this thing
called the internet.

- Rick



Yea, like on msnbc. Get a load of what this passenger "lady" has to say.
Being alive and unhurt wasn't enough, maybe she expected a personal escort
to a plush RV with champagne & caviar?

The O2 masks never dropped? Maybe it's because the plane was on the ground?
Yea, lets add some O2 to the resulting fire!

Damn airline got her shoes muddy! Ohhhh, the humanity!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8801366/

Uggh!


  #34  
Old August 3rd 05, 03:59 AM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gary Drescher wrote:

Saying "pan-pan" already declares an emergency.


I don't see the above fact mentioned in the AIM chapter you referenced.
Does PAN-PAN declare an emergency in US airspace as far as ATC is
concerned?



--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #35  
Old August 3rd 05, 04:12 AM
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CW wrote:
CBC report no fatalities, 14 minor injuries.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ane050802.html


I loved this part from that link: "At mid-afternoon Tuesday, a
spokesperson with the Greater Toronto Airports Authority said lightning
was causing technical problems with the airport's lightning-detection
system."

Eh? ;-)

  #36  
Old August 3rd 05, 04:12 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Gary Drescher wrote:

Saying "pan-pan" already declares an emergency.


I don't see the above fact mentioned in the AIM chapter you referenced.
Does PAN-PAN declare an emergency in US airspace as far as ATC is
concerned?


It was my understanding that a Pan gave you clear communications, by getting
all other calls on the freq. stopped. Close?
--
Jim in NC

  #37  
Old August 3rd 05, 04:20 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Gary Drescher wrote:

Saying "pan-pan" already declares an emergency.
There are two levels of emergency--urgency (pan-pan)
and distress (mayday). (AIM 6-1-2a)


I don't see the above fact mentioned in the AIM chapter you referenced.


AIM 6-1-2a discusses distress and urgency conditions. The Pilot/Controller
Glossary defines "mayday" and "pan-pan" (respectively) as signaling those
conditions.

Does PAN-PAN declare an emergency in US airspace as far
as ATC is concerned?


Yes, "mayday" and "pan-pan" are recognized internationally, according to the
Pilot/Controller Glossary.

--Gary


  #38  
Old August 3rd 05, 04:46 AM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter R." wrote in

That seems to be cutting it really close. Does anyone know if company
rules
usually require more than the FAA mins?


Do company rules apply when a pilot declares an emergency?


? And, who declared an emergency?

moo


  #39  
Old August 3rd 05, 08:40 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Skywise,

Luftanasa 737


Man, you need glasses or something. The spelling is "Lufthansa". And
the plane is an Air France Airbus. Please pay at least minimal
attention to the facts. Thank you.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #40  
Old August 3rd 05, 08:40 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave,

Reports are that it was struck by lighting AFTER it landed, and lost all
controls.


And who exactly would "report" that, right after the accident? Please
folks, get a grip.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilots Slick Piloting 4 November 20th 04 11:21 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.