![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jj,
given that; a/ the tragedy happened less than 48 hours ago b/ you werent there and know none of the facts c/ you have only heard the vague details from somebody who wasnt there, who heard from somebody else.. why dont you have a bit of tact, do us all a favour, and as we say in the UK.. Wind your neck in ! There will be a full accident investigation report into this tragedy, once thats published, perhaps then you might consider it to be a more approriate time to forward your views... Now lets drop this until the investigation has been completed and show at least some respect to Neil, and those left grieving! Toby At 01:54 11 August 2005, Jj Sinclair wrote: Well, Kirk, the first poster said the pilot was finishing. He also said the pilot was arrested, why? Because he committed a homicide. That's right he was responsible for the death of an innocent bystander. This tragic loss of life occured because the junior pilot was performing the prescribed finish maneuver. He was flying the finish gate because that's what we do, we sanction it, its in our rules. The local authoraties did their job, they arrested the guy responsible and the competition was suspended. How many more finish gate accidents must we endure before this outmoded, unneccessary and proven unsafe finish gate is abolished and replaced by the mandatory GPS finish cylinder? You really don't want to argue that the pilot wasn't operating his aircraft below 500 feet (not in the act of landing) and that he wasn't within 500 feet of a person, do you? JJ Sinclair wrote: Condolences to all affected by this tragedy. But, JJ, tell me how a correctly performed contest finish at 50 ft (per current SRA rules) and per FARs (no overflying of people, man-made objects, reckless, etc) has direct relevance with this accident? By your logic, takeoffs should be done away with (ref groundloop that hit and injured spectator at Tonopah) at contests, too. And how do you know it was a finish - it could have been a pre-arranged photo op after the finish, coordinated between the photographer and the pilot - that went horribly wrong. Not the first time that has happened. Sorry, you are on the wrong soapbox this time. Take a deep breath and go fix a glider or something. Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |