![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't get it: Why on earth do so many people pull up and do a
circuit? There must be a difference in the US and the IGC definition of the finish gate/line. Can someone explain? Why is it not normal (at least judging from what I read here it isn't in the US) to land straight in after the finishline? In a paper by John Cochrane (Safer Finishes) there's a list of accidents. More than half of them have nothing to do with the finishing procedure. They could have happened just the same with any other procedure, some even without a contest, some did'nt even happen at the airfield. All the others (6) are the pullup-stall-spin type. So again: why pull up? After flying dozens of finishes at international comps and many more in various versions at national and regional comps I am absolutely convinced that a finishline at ground level at the beginning of the runway and then landing straight ahead is the safest method, especially when many competitors arrive at the same time. I'd hate to be in a situation with ten or more gliders all on circuit at the same time not knowing who's going to turn when and where because everybody has his own idea of where the pattern is. Marcel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because it's fun.
If you don't like it, or are likely to spin in after the pull-up, just don't do it. Even with a finish line, nothing prevents you from landing straight in. -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" "MaD" a écrit dans le message de news: ... I don't get it: Why on earth do so many people pull up and do a circuit? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MaD wrote:
I don't get it: Why on earth do so many people pull up and do a circuit? Because it's faster than a straight in. Ever tried to land on a short runway after having arrived at the runway threshold with Vne and a full load of water? That said, at the competitions I know, there is mostly a minimal height at which the finish line must be crossed if you don't land straight in. Stefan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to disagree here. It is normally not faster. If it turns out to
be, it means you seriously misjudged your final glide or the last thermal was something like 4m/s AND the runway is extremely short. And yes, at most contests I've flown so far it was possible to land straight ahead arriving with close to Vne at the beginning of the runway. As mentioned, that speed is not the one you should try to have at that point. Regards Marcel Duenner |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to disagree here. It is normally not faster. If it turns out to
be, it means you seriously misjudged your final glide or the last thermal was something like 4m/s AND the runway is extremely short. And yes, at most contests I've flown so far it was possible to land straight ahead arriving with close to Vne at the beginning of the runway. As mentioned, that speed is not the one you should try to have at that point. Regards Marcel Duenner |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MaD wrote:
Sorry to disagree here. It is normally not faster. If it turns out to be, it means you seriously misjudged your final glide I often do misjudge my final glide, as do many of the other pilots in the US contests I've flown in. Sometimes it is due to lift along the way that I didn't predict. At some airports, it is not possible to land safely within several miles of the airport. Finishers tend to be high until they are certain they can cross this bad area, then speed up. or the last thermal was something like 4m/s Yes, we have these also. AND the runway is extremely short. Our Regional contests are held at Ephrata (Washington State). Is 3000' extremely short? It is very wide, and easy to land normally on, but not when arriving at Vne. And yes, at most contests I've flown so far it was possible to land straight ahead arriving with close to Vne at the beginning of the runway. At some contest airports I've flown at, this is also possible. Usually, the glider must then be pushed off the runway, and the pilot must wait an hour or more until there are no more gliders finishing before the glider can be pushed back down the runway to the tiedown area. If it is a wide grass field instead of narrow paved runway, it would be possible to retrieve the glider right away, but that is rarely the case. As mentioned, that speed is not the one you should try to have at that point. Western US conditions often mean the final glide is flown very fast. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Eric Greenwell schrieb: ... or the last thermal was something like 4m/s Yes, we have these also. AND the runway is extremely short. Our Regional contests are held at Ephrata (Washington State). Is 3000' extremely short? It is very wide, and easy to land normally on, but not when arriving at Vne. No, here in central Europe 3000' considered long. Few airfields are that long. Our Airfield actually does have a bit over 3000' of grass rwy but is no more than 250' wide at the widest point, only about 190' at the narrowest. Swiss Nationals 1996: I think it was 28 gliders landing within just over three minutes. No problem, because evrybody behaved and rolled out to the side. But I can see the problem with paved runways from which you don't want to roll off without knowing exactly you won't damage the glider. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Aug 2005 04:16:57 -0700, "MaD" wrote:
Why is it not normal ...to land straight in after the finishline? Can someone explain? Yes. Many US contests are held at airports, not airfields. In many cases, the only safe place to land is the runway. The straight in finish you describe is safe as long as the area between the finish line and the stopping point is landable, with plenty of width available for simultaneous finishers. All contest sites should be round grass fields of 1-mile radius. -Pat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As we see, there are many possibilities and variations on finishes.
If you set a minimun finish altitude on a finish cylinder, you can do the same for the finish line. No difference there. It is good to have the line/cylinder so that you can finish and land directly. But if there are no trees etc. before the airfield, you still have the low high energy finishes. They just open the airbrakes in high speed just after the finishline and land straight. So it can still be quite dangerous. The finish line should be before the airfield and you should have there a minumum altitude limit. Or ? Soaring is not a spectator sport, but we all go out to see the finishes. But there is not much to see, if the gliders come in slowly and land straight. Okay, you still have some drama in it, if you know the start times so you can see who has flown fastest. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-But if there are no trees etc. before the airfield, you still have
the low high energy finishes. They just open the airbrakes in high speed just after the finishline and land straight. So it can still be quite dangerous. --- And what exactly is dangerous about that? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
US Region 7 Soaring Contest | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | May 11th 05 03:19 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest | Mario Crosina | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 06:31 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |