|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 14th 05, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Landing gear is much better in the Seneca II
Seneca II is easier for the passengers to enter (club seating) Seneca II will give you a good honest 165 knots and burn a total of 21 to 23 GPH. Seneca II has counter rotating propellers. Seneca II has a user friendly fuel system compared to a C-310. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 06:51 PM |
| How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
| Insuring a C310 vs. Piper Seneca | Dave | Owning | 17 | October 27th 04 03:29 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
| I am going to do it again! A Piper Seneca? | Michelle P | Owning | 5 | August 20th 03 01:59 AM |
Hybrid Mode
