A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C172 Flaps up or 10 degrees for takeoff



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old August 15th 05, 02:22 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that some 172s only have 30deg of flaps availible. Full flaps
produce *some* additional lift even if there is a large drag increase. Keep
in mind that you are trading aerodynamic drag against the drag of the tires
in sand. On my airplanes MU-2 and Helio Courier minimium ground roll is a
function of weight, flaps and power availible.

In the Helio:

At normal density altitudes and light weights minimium ground roll is with
full flaps (40deg). This use of full flaps increases obstacle clearance
distance but reduces ground roll.

At some high density altitude and high weight the airplane won't climb out
of ground effect with full flaps without using a tremendous amount of
distance and a reduced flap setting is required.

The Helio is not that different from the 172 in terms of flaps. Both have
single slotted fowler flaps.

In the MU-2

Take off with flaps 20 uses less ground roll than flaps 5deg. Flaps 40deg
used even less distance but isn't used because the airplane becomes airborn
below Vmc and can't climb on one engine with flaps 40.

My guess is that a 172 at light weights and low density altitude will use
less runway with more than 10deg of flaps and the more powerful the engine
the more pronounced this difference. It would be interesting to see if the
new 172s have a full set of takeoff charts showing all altitudes, temps,
weights and flaps settings

Mike
MU-2


"David Rind" wrote in message
...
Mike Rapoport wrote:
Some flaps (maybe even full flaps) until airborn, accelerate in ground
effect and then climb. If you are interested in this stuff, read F.E.
Potts book on bush flying.

Mike
MU-2


"grubertm" wrote in message
oups.com...

So what's the best procedure for a sand strip, 4000AGL, 50ft obstacle ?
I can see the advantage of 10 deg. flaps for a mud strip, but I am not
sure whether the increased friction due to sand is worth the decrease
in climb rate..

- Marco


I haven't been following this thread that closely so I may have missed
something, but "full flaps"? I thought that once you got to 40 degrees of
flaps on a 172 you were just adding drag without any appreciable reduction
in stall speed. I can't see how that would get you into ground effect any
quicker....

--
David Rind




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Headwinds, always Paul kgyy Piloting 36 June 9th 05 01:05 AM
757 flaps miss-aligned in cruise AnyBody43 General Aviation 1 April 2nd 04 01:01 AM
Cessna 182S flaps EDR Piloting 7 January 16th 04 02:37 AM
C182 Stabilized Approach III Piloting 16 December 16th 03 07:36 PM
Flaps and V-Tails of Death Wallace Berry Soaring 59 November 26th 03 09:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.