![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that some 172s only have 30deg of flaps availible. Full flaps
produce *some* additional lift even if there is a large drag increase. Keep in mind that you are trading aerodynamic drag against the drag of the tires in sand. On my airplanes MU-2 and Helio Courier minimium ground roll is a function of weight, flaps and power availible. In the Helio: At normal density altitudes and light weights minimium ground roll is with full flaps (40deg). This use of full flaps increases obstacle clearance distance but reduces ground roll. At some high density altitude and high weight the airplane won't climb out of ground effect with full flaps without using a tremendous amount of distance and a reduced flap setting is required. The Helio is not that different from the 172 in terms of flaps. Both have single slotted fowler flaps. In the MU-2 Take off with flaps 20 uses less ground roll than flaps 5deg. Flaps 40deg used even less distance but isn't used because the airplane becomes airborn below Vmc and can't climb on one engine with flaps 40. My guess is that a 172 at light weights and low density altitude will use less runway with more than 10deg of flaps and the more powerful the engine the more pronounced this difference. It would be interesting to see if the new 172s have a full set of takeoff charts showing all altitudes, temps, weights and flaps settings Mike MU-2 "David Rind" wrote in message ... Mike Rapoport wrote: Some flaps (maybe even full flaps) until airborn, accelerate in ground effect and then climb. If you are interested in this stuff, read F.E. Potts book on bush flying. Mike MU-2 "grubertm" wrote in message oups.com... So what's the best procedure for a sand strip, 4000AGL, 50ft obstacle ? I can see the advantage of 10 deg. flaps for a mud strip, but I am not sure whether the increased friction due to sand is worth the decrease in climb rate.. - Marco I haven't been following this thread that closely so I may have missed something, but "full flaps"? I thought that once you got to 40 degrees of flaps on a 172 you were just adding drag without any appreciable reduction in stall speed. I can't see how that would get you into ground effect any quicker.... -- David Rind |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Headwinds, always | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 36 | June 9th 05 01:05 AM |
757 flaps miss-aligned in cruise | AnyBody43 | General Aviation | 1 | April 2nd 04 01:01 AM |
Cessna 182S flaps | EDR | Piloting | 7 | January 16th 04 02:37 AM |
C182 Stabilized Approach | III | Piloting | 16 | December 16th 03 07:36 PM |
Flaps and V-Tails of Death | Wallace Berry | Soaring | 59 | November 26th 03 09:54 PM |