A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

O2 Mask On Pilot?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 16th 05, 12:09 AM
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
(ii) At flight altitudes above flight level 350 unless one pilot at
the controls of the airplane is wearing and using an oxygen mask that
is secured and sealed and that either supplies oxygen at all times or
automatically supplies oxygen whenever the cabin pressure altitude of
the airplane exceeds 14,000 feet (MSL), except that the one pilot need
not wear and use an oxygen mask while at or below flight level 410 if
there are two pilots at the controls and each pilot has a
quick-donning type of oxygen mask that can be placed on the face with
one hand from the ready position within 5 seconds, supplying oxygen
and properly secured and sealed.


The Part 121 requirement for Certificated Aircarriers is more restrictive
than for Part 91 Operators. The FL350 is replaced with FL 250.

Bob Moore
  #2  
Old August 16th 05, 12:37 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Moore" wrote in message
21...

The Part 121 requirement for Certificated Aircarriers is more restrictive
than for Part 91 Operators. The FL350 is replaced with FL 250.


But still not applicable to the Greek 737 that went down yesterday, although
a similar requirement may have existed for them.


  #3  
Old August 16th 05, 04:13 AM
GeorgeB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:37:07 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

"Bob Moore" wrote in message
. 121...

The Part 121 requirement for Certificated Aircarriers is more restrictive
than for Part 91 Operators. The FL350 is replaced with FL 250.


But still not applicable to the Greek 737 that went down yesterday, although
a similar requirement may have existed for them.


What would have been the effect if the O2 bottle for the cockpit had
been inadvertently filled with breathing air rather than O2? I seem
to remember that this was discovered to have happened somewhere in the
US in the last few months? I would think that a casual test would
have found it normal, but that the PPO2 would have been substantially
too low even with a pressurized mask?
  #4  
Old August 16th 05, 08:54 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GeorgeB wrote:

What would have been the effect if the O2 bottle for the cockpit had
been inadvertently filled with breathing air rather than O2?


They would have tested the system before the flight and found it
working. They would have put on their mask in flight and thought it
worked, slowly fading away without recognizing it. You may or may not
recognize hypoxia when you suspect it and really watch your body, you
definitely don't recognize it when you're unwary.

Stefan
  #5  
Old August 16th 05, 10:09 AM
fred
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote in message
...
GeorgeB wrote:

What would have been the effect if the O2 bottle for the cockpit had
been inadvertently filled with breathing air rather than O2?


They would have tested the system before the flight and found it working.
They would have put on their mask in flight and thought it worked, slowly
fading away without recognizing it. You may or may not recognize hypoxia
when you suspect it and really watch your body, you definitely don't
recognize it when you're unwary.



The question was what happens when breathing air from the mask rather than
O2 and the answer is nothing at all at a cabin pressure of 10K feet.


  #6  
Old August 16th 05, 10:19 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fred wrote:

The question was what happens when breathing air from the mask rather than
O2 and the answer is nothing at all at a cabin pressure of 10K feet.


Got me :-). On the other hand, if the bottels were filled with say N2
instead of O2, they would still have faded away even at 10 kft. Further
speculations?

Stefan
  #7  
Old August 16th 05, 11:21 AM
fred
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote in message
...
fred wrote:

The question was what happens when breathing air from the mask rather
than O2 and the answer is nothing at all at a cabin pressure of 10K feet.


Got me :-). On the other hand, if the bottels were filled with say N2
instead of O2, they would still have faded away even at 10 kft. Further
speculations?


Yes and pure N2 is faster than air at 35,000.


  #8  
Old August 17th 05, 03:32 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fred wrote:

The question was what happens when breathing air from the mask rather than
O2 and the answer is nothing at all at a cabin pressure of 10K feet.


But the question was asked about pilots that were at 35,000'. I believe that
George B. is correct that the partial pressure would be too low and the pilots
would pass out.

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.
  #9  
Old August 18th 05, 07:50 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"GeorgeB" wrote in message
...

What would have been the effect if the O2 bottle for the cockpit had
been inadvertently filled with breathing air rather than O2?


From what would the oxygen system be serviced in your scenario? A
compressor?


  #10  
Old August 19th 05, 01:51 AM
GeorgeB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:50:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"GeorgeB" wrote in message
.. .

What would have been the effect if the O2 bottle for the cockpit had
been inadvertently filled with breathing air rather than O2?


From what would the oxygen system be serviced in your scenario? A
compressor?


I've far more experience with industrial compressed gasses than with
aircraft oxygen, and see much more "compressed breathing air" than
BREATHING compressed O2. (Oxygen for oxyacetelyne is to different
standards, but I think it is just as good; several college buddies
would spend some time breathing it after having too much to drink the
night before. Ah, the REAL hangover cure.

Firefighters and scuba divers use it in large quantiies. Bottles are
common with gas suppliers. What I don't know is how the fittings
compare.

Nor do I know how a plane's bottles are filled; via compressor from
low pressure sources, high pressure via cascade bottles, or ???

I do know that the fittings need to be clean of oxydizable materials;
storoes of a little oil on gauge threads, if true, keep one careful.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? Blueskies Piloting 14 July 12th 05 05:45 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.