![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could it be possible the one prop was turning and the other one was stopped
to help get rid of any excess speed? Just a thought. Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech "George Patterson" wrote in message news:NwcMe.166$zb.14@trndny04... Dave S wrote: I think the Navy would hang someone from the yardarm (if they still have em)..... Until the termites finish off the U.S.S. Constitution, the Navy will have quite a few yardarms. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "W P Dixon" wrote Could it be possible the one prop was turning and the other one was stopped to help get rid of any excess speed? Just a thought. I doubt it. They would use close to normal speed, and plus, they con control speed all they want, with prop pitch. If anything, I'll bet they can adjust speed better, with both burning. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A stopped/feathered prop has less drag than a windmilling prop, so if there
were any effect on speed it would be an increase, not a decrease. Bob Gardner "W P Dixon" wrote in message ... Could it be possible the one prop was turning and the other one was stopped to help get rid of any excess speed? Just a thought. Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech "George Patterson" wrote in message news:NwcMe.166$zb.14@trndny04... Dave S wrote: I think the Navy would hang someone from the yardarm (if they still have em)..... Until the termites finish off the U.S.S. Constitution, the Navy will have quite a few yardarms. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting,
My thinking was that without the prop operating it was not producing thrust and maybe with the thrust of one engine instead of both it may slow their approach speed some. Patrick "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... A stopped/feathered prop has less drag than a windmilling prop, so if there were any effect on speed it would be an increase, not a decrease. Bob Gardner |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure doesn't enter into the thinking of any multiengine pilot. Airspeed is
airspeed, no matter where the impetus comes from. If the book says to approach at 90 knots, for example, the pilot is going to maintain 90 knots no matter how many engines are operating. Bob Gardner Author, THE COMPLETE MULTIENGINE PILOT (can't pass up the opportunity!) "W P Dixon" wrote in message news ![]() Interesting, My thinking was that without the prop operating it was not producing thrust and maybe with the thrust of one engine instead of both it may slow their approach speed some. Patrick "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... A stopped/feathered prop has less drag than a windmilling prop, so if there were any effect on speed it would be an increase, not a decrease. Bob Gardner |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good Point! And good plug !
![]() Patrick "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... Sure doesn't enter into the thinking of any multiengine pilot. Airspeed is airspeed, no matter where the impetus comes from. If the book says to approach at 90 knots, for example, the pilot is going to maintain 90 knots no matter how many engines are operating. Bob Gardner Author, THE COMPLETE MULTIENGINE PILOT (can't pass up the opportunity!) "W P Dixon" wrote in message news ![]() Interesting, My thinking was that without the prop operating it was not producing thrust and maybe with the thrust of one engine instead of both it may slow their approach speed some. Patrick "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... A stopped/feathered prop has less drag than a windmilling prop, so if there were any effect on speed it would be an increase, not a decrease. Bob Gardner |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Gardner wrote:
Bob Gardner Author, THE COMPLETE MULTIENGINE PILOT (can't pass up the opportunity!) out of curiosity, have you been tempted, just once, to use a slightly different spelling for 'complete'? :-)) --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A&P heroics | Jim | Piloting | 31 | July 18th 05 07:26 PM |
Judge halts work on Navy landing field in eastern N.C. | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 1 | April 21st 04 12:04 PM |
Cessna landing gear legs Reserve MET! | Bill Berle | Restoration | 0 | February 22nd 04 07:50 PM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Military Aviation | 11 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Naval Aviation | 11 | July 7th 03 03:47 PM |