A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

changing operating limitations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 16th 05, 05:55 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim,
I have spoken to a few Sonex builders /owners and they pretty much all
agree the best way to stay in the sport pilot class with a Sonex is to use a
VW powerplant and a climb prop, a cruise prop on the VW still puts you over
the cruise speed. It's a sharp little plane!

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"GeorgeB" wrote

I'd certainly like for a citation on that one. While neither a pilot
or a builder, I follow the Sonex site; their plane with the Jab 3300,
at WOT, greatly exceeds limits.


You are right on that, I believe. At one time it was stated as WOT.

As they understand it, the rule is
"Maximum speed in level flight with maximum continuous power (Vh) of
not more than 120 kts (138 mph) CAS under standard atmospheric
conditions at sea level." The word "continuous" is in there ... the
3300 Jabiru is specified at 2750 RPM max continuous which keeps things
legal. Many of the owners report significantly higher capability ...
and maximum RPM is specified, IIRC, at 3300.


I think you have the key here, when you say the Jab engine is rated for
2700
continuous. (by the manufacturer) That is in line with other direct drive
RPMs. The higher RPM's can be done with that engine, but just like the
other major direct drive makers, you can not run them for long at those
speeds, without some consequences.

If you took a Lycoming, and said you were going to limit it for continuous
operation at 2,000 RPM, that would not fly for the sport plane
restrictions.
They (the FAA) all know that this engine can run much faster than that,
with
no harm. So you are told to try again; no dice.

It seems if you have a homebrew engine, you have an advantage, because you
are the one that will set the continuous operating RPM's. That is my
take,
anyway.

Sorry about the WOT bit. Best be having the WOT close to the continuous
RPM, if you want to have a chance of passing, IMHO.

A lot of these things are unknown, since the envelope has not yet been
pushed, and case precedents have not been established, yet. We will have
to
wait and see how much they will let us get away with. g
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Weird Experimental Certificate wording - Normal? Noel Luneau Soaring 7 January 11th 05 02:53 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Onerous OPerating Procedures/Improper (illegal?) Use of Unicom Freq. rjciii Soaring 2 July 19th 03 07:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.