A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bends, kinks and splices



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 17th 05, 12:52 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Michael Horowitz wrote:
How does an A&P know if he can simply straighten out a longeron or if
he's going to have to cut and splice?


-----------------------------------------------

I think you've left a few too many loose ends for a concise answer.
However...

The nature and extent of the damage tends to dictate the method of
repair but the airframe usually defines which repair procedures are
most applicable.

Steel tubing without any traumatic injury such as shrapnel wounds or
bullet holes, the degree of deformation and the surface texture tells
you if the member may be straightened or if it should be replace.
Aluminum, due to the stretch resulting from even a minor deformation,
you generally cut it back to clean, un-deformed metal and make up a
splice.

But I'll tell you pard, getting a kink out of a wooden longeron is a
hell of a chore; trying to straighten that stuff just makes it worse,
your rivets don't hold for **** and don't even think of trying to weld
it. Vast mystery I guess.

Or at least, half-vast :-)

-R.S.Hoover

  #3  
Old August 17th 05, 05:58 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ernest Christley" wrote

The secret is to use a carbeurizing flame. Do it right, and you'll
never have to worry about crashing the airplane.


great big chuckle

You could go as far as saying, that by welding that one piece, it will
guarantee that you never will have to work on the plane again!
--
Jim in NC

  #4  
Old August 17th 05, 05:27 AM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It also reduces the weight very effectively!

But on a serious note what kind of plane are we talking about? I may be able
to help.

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Ernest Christley" wrote

The secret is to use a carbeurizing flame. Do it right, and you'll
never have to worry about crashing the airplane.


great big chuckle

You could go as far as saying, that by welding that one piece, it will
guarantee that you never will have to work on the plane again!
--
Jim in NC


  #5  
Old August 17th 05, 10:17 AM
Michael Horowitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WP- steel and fabric taildragger. - Mike

"W P Dixon" wrote:

It also reduces the weight very effectively!

But on a serious note what kind of plane are we talking about? I may be able
to help.

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Ernest Christley" wrote

The secret is to use a carbeurizing flame. Do it right, and you'll
never have to worry about crashing the airplane.


great big chuckle

You could go as far as saying, that by welding that one piece, it will
guarantee that you never will have to work on the plane again!
--
Jim in NC


  #6  
Old August 17th 05, 02:41 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael,
As was mentioned , the know all see all is the Structural Repair Manual.
And with saying that I will add , if it is an old plane it still may not
help you much. If it is a plane that still gets made you probably will find
everything you need in the SRM. ( As the previous post I was glad to learn
the no corrosion stuff in that SRM) SRM's sure usually cover corrosion,
damage repairs, and what is acceptable. For things not acceptable you are
usually given a proper repair. And alot of times even told when engineering
analysis was necessary. Since this is a homebuilt forum, I will say that
SRM's are for certified aircraft published by the aircraft maker.
Using AC43.13-1B, I would say anything you felt would take an engineer
to approve of a fix , replace the tube. If you don't see a repair in there
it's usually because the fix will have to come from higher up..DME.
Homebuilts get alot of freedom in their fixes, but holding your airplane to
some FAA standards can be a good thing as well. Most homebuilders nor A&P's
are engineers,....and you may have a case here where you need one. Your
other option would be replace the tube in question.
Of course since myself nor any of us on here have seen the damage in
question my answer is on the side of safety and caution. When it comes to
airplanes it always seems to work out best that way

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Michael Horowitz" wrote in message
...
WP- steel and fabric taildragger. - Mike


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.