![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:
Quite a bit more expensive, aren't they? The cheapest flyable ones will definitely cost you more than a TT 150. The fabric is not a problem if the paint was properly chosen and applied, but you never know if that's the case. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson writes:
K. Ari Krupnikov wrote: Quite a bit more expensive, aren't they? The cheapest flyable ones will definitely cost you more than a TT 150. The fabric is not a problem if the paint was properly chosen and applied, but you never know if that's the case. I'm buying my first airplane, so bear with me. Where I live, hangar space is tough to come by (SF Bay area). I was under the impression that it's not a good idea to keep a fabric airplane outside, so I figured an all-metal TT would work better. Also, I've never flown a Maule. Is anybody in NorCal willing to give me a ride if I pay for gas? Ari. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to ....fish and you'll be hearing about non-renewable resources for the rest of your life. -- Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money betting on the outcome. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:
I was under the impression that it's not a good idea to keep a fabric airplane outside, so I figured an all-metal TT would work better. Aircraft used to be covered with linen or cotton. That would be painted with "dope" to keep air from passing through the weave. Both of these fabrics will last a long time if hangared and rot if left outside. The rot time varies depending on ambient weather conditions. I personally know of one J-3 Piper still flying with an immaculate 30-year-old cotton skin. Been hangared since the cover job. Modern fabric-covered aircraft use synthetics such as Ceconite (AKA Polyfiber) or Razorback. Ceconite will deteriorate when exposed to UV rays, so the aircraft are carefully painted to prevent this. Two methods work. With both, you paint the aircraft with primer coats of nitrate and butyrate dope. You can either follow this with color coats of butyrate dope, or use color coats of polyurethane. An aircraft covered in Ceconite and painted with either of these methods can be kept outside. If the color coats are butyrate dope, the paint must be "rejuvenated" about every 10 years, but this supposedly is true even if the aircraft is hangared. The problem with Maules is that, prior to 1996, the factory used enamel as the color coat over a dope primer. Parts of the aircraft are fiberglass, some parts are metal, and some are fabric. Dope doesn't last on bare metal and cracks on fiberglass. Enamel shrinks and produces cracks and other problems in the fabric. Most have been recovered, but who knows (I know of one '95 model that hasn't been). The only real cure is to strip and recover and repaint the aircraft, though some people have had success sanding the finish coat off and repainting. Anyway. If you get a fabric aircraft that has a Ceconite or Polyfiber skin with polyurethane applied over a dope base coat, you shouldn't have problems with the fabric. Corrosion is a different issue, but metal aircraft also have problems with this. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
: Anyway. If you get a fabric aircraft that has a Ceconite or Polyfiber skin with : polyurethane applied over a dope base coat, you shouldn't have problems with : the fabric. : Corrosion is a different issue, but metal aircraft also have problems with this. Just out of curiosity, if one were to learn the art of recovering so as to do it oneself, what would a reasonable expense be to recover a bird like that? It seems that so long as you know how to work on it, fabric planes aren't a big deal. In a lot of ways, they're better than metal, since you can reasonable take the lid off and look inside for corrosion. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
: I spoke with a fellow who redid his Champ. IIRC, his cost was a bit over $2,000. : A lot depends on whether you use bolts of fabric and glue the stuff directly to : the frame or buy pre-sewn envelopes. Maule glues the fabric onto the frame. : Maule Flight will charge you $12,000 for a strip and recover. ... but then it must be painted as well, right Depending on how much of *that* you do yourself, it could cost considerably more than the recovering. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
Maule Flight will charge you $12,000 for a strip and recover. Is that without paint? By the way, I have a '96 "we have them on sale" MX7180a model (actually built in '95). Not the good paint (still doing it against the hangar wall). Not the really bad (auto)paint. IOTW, it chips off slowly. I love the damn thing if only I had the good paint |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule Driver wrote:
Is that without paint? That's the whole job, paint and all. I got that price from Rautgunde several years ago, though. It may have gone up. They also had a price of ~$15,000 for a complete renovation. By the way, I have a '96 "we have them on sale" MX7180a model (actually built in '95). Not the good paint (still doing it against the hangar wall). Not the really bad (auto)paint. IOTW, it chips off slowly. If I'd bought the 180, I might still have mine. On the other hand, the loan would've been larger and I might have lost it all. I found out what the paint scheme was from a Randolph representative at Oshkosh several years ago. He said that Maule used the Ceconite process, which specifies a coat of nitrate dope, followed by silver butyrate. He said they would add a coat of white butyrate over the silver as a primer and then spray the enamel over that. He said it was possible to sand off the color coats (the enamel) down to the white dope primer or even down to the silver. Don't go into the silver coat at all -- if you see it, stop. Once you get the enamel off of the fabric, spray with butyrate rejuvenator. After that, you can apply either polyurethane or butyrate top coats. If you're plane is like mine was when I sold it, you can see patches of the white butyrate where the color coats have flaked off of the horizontal stabilizer. We did not discuss redoing the paint on the metal or fiberglass sections (unless maybe he was recommending that technique for those sections too). I know that the upper surfaces of my wings were badly peeled by the time I sold it, so something would have to be done there. Since chemical paint strippers will melt Ceconite in a heartbeat, I would consider something like bead-blasting. Randolph made the paints Maule was using back then. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
K. Ari Krupnikov wrote: Quite a bit more expensive, aren't they? The cheapest flyable ones will definitely cost you more than a TT 150. The fabric is not a problem if the paint was properly chosen and applied, but you never know if that's the case. If the Aviation Consumer reviews of Maule planes are any indication, odss are good that it wasn't painted properly. That has been consistently cited as a problem with Maules. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
George Jr sent out of Texas by father as a 'drunken liability' | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 17 | September 9th 04 05:26 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Texas Soars into Aviation History | A | Piloting | 7 | December 17th 03 02:09 AM |
Bob Wander at Marfa, Texas | Burt Compton | Soaring | 0 | September 16th 03 02:59 PM |
good book about prisoners of war | Jim Atkins | Military Aviation | 16 | August 1st 03 10:18 AM |