A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

At last, the truth...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 05, 04:21 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Another approach to convince municipalities to continue to operate
their airports is to make them aware of the FAA's imminent intent to
implement the Small Aircraft Transportation System*.


But this is one of the reaons municipalites want to close the
airports... residents are afraid of jet noise. And they do have a point.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #2  
Old August 19th 05, 10:54 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:21:26 GMT, Jose
wrote in : :

Another approach to convince municipalities to continue to operate
their airports is to make them aware of the FAA's imminent intent to
implement the Small Aircraft Transportation System*.


But this is one of the reaons municipalites want to close the
airports... residents are afraid of jet noise. And they do have a point.


If the City Council members choose to deprive their city's residents
of the means of shuttling to the region's international airport so
that another strip mall can be built, that is their prerogative, but I
wouldn't re-elect them. :-(

And today's smaller turbofan powered aircraft aren't significantly
more noisy than piston powered aircraft especially when you consider
the shorter time they are nearby as they climb out on departure.

  #3  
Old August 19th 05, 10:58 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:54:06 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:21:26 GMT, Jose
wrote in : :

Another approach to convince municipalities to continue to operate
their airports is to make them aware of the FAA's imminent intent to
implement the Small Aircraft Transportation System*.


But this is one of the reaons municipalites want to close the
airports... residents are afraid of jet noise. And they do have a point.


Ahhh... No they don't.
It's a point based on ignorance as today's small jets are quieter than
many older prop planes and pretty much on par with most of the newer
prop planes. No, many can't match one of the new 172s, but they do a
good job.

Now, when you get up to the Falcon 900 you are pretty much reaching
the break even point compared to an old Bonanza with a two blade prop,
but the smaller jets with turbofans are much quieter. The don't burn
all the grass off the end of the runway when they run up the engines
either. That 900 pretty much cleaned the grass from the end of the
runway to the fence by the road. Good thing it was green grass and
not dry. :-))

Here the residents were afraid if we lengthened 18/36 and 06/24 to
4000 they'd be inundated with jet noise. What they didn't realize was
we have a number of jets in and out and they never notice then. What
we couldn't convince them was on 18/36 going from 3000 to 4000 feet
would make it quieter. On a hot day I'm only a few hundred feet
over their heads, but at least I went to a 3-blade prop. When I had
the 2-blade they used to complain I was rattling the dishes in the
cupboards and I have no doubt I was.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


If the City Council members choose to deprive their city's residents
of the means of shuttling to the region's international airport so
that another strip mall can be built, that is their prerogative, but I
wouldn't re-elect them. :-(

And today's smaller turbofan powered aircraft aren't significantly
more noisy than piston powered aircraft especially when you consider
the shorter time they are nearby as they climb out on departure.

Roger
  #4  
Old August 20th 05, 04:21 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

residents are afraid of jet noise. And they do have a point.


Ahhh... No they don't.
It's a point based on ignorance as today's small jets are quieter than
many older prop planes and pretty much on par with most of the newer
prop planes.


Well, it may be based on ignorance, but it is ignorance that I also
have, and I'm a pilot. I've never actually heard a microjet (and I
don't automatically believe what the manufacturers say)

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swift Boat Veterans For Truth: Are They Going To Sink John Kerry? BUFDRVR Military Aviation 151 September 12th 04 09:59 PM
Vietnam Veterans for the Truth About Deferments Riddick Military Aviation 0 August 24th 04 03:23 AM
~WHO FEARS THE TRUTH? ~ MLenoch Military Aviation 0 April 4th 04 01:00 AM
Truth behind "Flight Academies"??? Sam Piloting 0 February 29th 04 10:01 PM
TRUTH OF THE MINI-500 TURBINE CONVERSION Dennis Chitwood Rotorcraft 10 January 7th 04 05:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.