A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 03, 04:23 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days
off twice a year.


That is truly good to know. Are annual increases merit based or COLA?
What are the promotion criteria?


Annual increases are the same as what every Social Security recipient
gets. Usually in the 3-4% range, next year however it is about 2.5%.
There are also increases based on your localities cost of living also
added onto that. As for promotion I do not get promoted unless I put
myself in a pool for a particular job opening. For example if Denver
needs a controller or three that job will get posted for everyone to
see. If I am interested in moving to Denver I will submit my paperwork.
I may or may not get selected, none of the criteria is based simply
upon years of experience. All promotions entail a paid move. Under no
circumstances will I get to work one day and find I have been promoted
to either another facility or into management of my current facility.

  #2  
Old November 19th 03, 10:24 PM
Matthew S. Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Newps wrote:


Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days
off twice a year.


That is truly good to know. Are annual increases merit based or COLA?
What are the promotion criteria?



Annual increases are the same as what every Social Security recipient
gets. Usually in the 3-4% range, next year however it is about 2.5%.
There are also increases based on your localities cost of living also
added onto that. As for promotion I do not get promoted unless I put
myself in a pool for a particular job opening. For example if Denver
needs a controller or three that job will get posted for everyone to
see. If I am interested in moving to Denver I will submit my paperwork.
I may or may not get selected, none of the criteria is based simply
upon years of experience. All promotions entail a paid move. Under no
circumstances will I get to work one day and find I have been promoted
to either another facility or into management of my current facility.


Where I work, our annual raises are called "merit increases" and are
quite variable from 0% to upwards of 10% based on your performance for
the year. Likewise, promotions are based on performance and increased
scope of responsibility (the ATC equivalent is probably working a larger
or busier airport or sector). We don't get COLAs and seniority plays no
role in our pay increases beyond the fact that experience should add to
your competence to some degree at least.


Matt

  #3  
Old November 19th 03, 02:23 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
news:aIrub.236709$Tr4.696802@attbi_s03...


Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

Because most private companies that perform functions similar to
governmental agencies are more efficient. I think new technology would
be adopted faster and with less bureaucracy. I think controller
performance would be rewarded more effectively. Last I knew, most civil
service jobs still had a lot of focus on seniority, more like a union
workforce in the private sector than a professional workforce in the
private sector.


Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off
twice a year.


Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union.




  #4  
Old November 19th 03, 02:43 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom S." wrote in message
...

Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union.


Not when it isn't the driving force in anything but vacation days.


  #5  
Old November 19th 03, 05:27 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or

Union.


Not when it isn't the driving force in anything but vacation days.

Riggggghhhttt!!


  #6  
Old November 19th 03, 04:29 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom S. wrote:



Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off
twice a year.



Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union.


I am not in the union. The only thing based on seniority is the order
in which you get to pick your days off every 6 months. The union local
used to get to set their own seniority policy for their own facility.
NATCA National put the kabosh on that several years ago and now we are
all under the same seniority policy nationwide. There are only 5 union
members at BIL ATCT out of 18 controllers. I will say that the FAA has
bent over and let NATCA run ATC for many years now but as far as
seniority goes it ain't nuthin' like say the UAW.

  #7  
Old November 19th 03, 05:08 AM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Newps" wrote in message
news:lkCub.180151$mZ5.1290067@attbi_s54...

Tom S. wrote:

Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our

days off
twice a year.


Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or

Union.

I am not in the union. The only thing based on seniority is the

order
in which you get to pick your days off every 6 months. The union

local
used to get to set their own seniority policy for their own

facility.
NATCA National put the kabosh on that several years ago and now we

are
all under the same seniority policy nationwide. There are only 5

union
members at BIL ATCT out of 18 controllers. I will say that the FAA

has
bent over and let NATCA run ATC for many years now but as far as
seniority goes it ain't nuthin' like say the UAW.


That's because, as Reagan proved in 1981, federal unions such as PATCO
and NATCA are toothless tigers because they cannot strike. Their
sole power resides in their ability to convince management by the
logical force of argument - and we all know how well that works if
management doesn't want to cooperate - or lobbying for political
support on Capitol Hill. NATCA's expensive PR campaign to influence
Congress in the FAA Reauthorization Bill, necessitated by the loss of
the political support that they enjoyed during the Clinton years,
proves that point.

All of which confirms your response to Tom Ass that he has no clue
about federal unions.



  #8  
Old November 20th 03, 01:33 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Mazor wrote:

That's because, as Reagan proved in 1981, federal unions such as PATCO
and NATCA are toothless tigers because they cannot strike. Their
sole power resides in their ability to convince management by the
logical force of argument - and we all know how well that works if
management doesn't want to cooperate - or lobbying for political
support on Capitol Hill.


NATCA just goes right over the head of management and directly to Congress.


NATCA's expensive PR campaign to influence
Congress in the FAA Reauthorization Bill, necessitated by the loss of
the political support that they enjoyed during the Clinton years,
proves that point.


NATCA is always going to Congress about something or other.

  #9  
Old November 19th 03, 03:02 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Tom S." wrote:

Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union.


It certainly was not a factor in the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and
Joiners of America, of which I was a member in the '70s.

George Patterson
The actions taken by the New Hampshire Episcopalians (ie. inducting a gay
bishop) are an affront to Christians everywhere. I am just thankful that
the church's founder, Henry VIII, and his wife Catherine of Aragon, and his
wife Anne Boleyn, and his wife Jane Seymour, and his wife Anne of Cleves,
and his wife Katherine Howard, and his wife Catherine Parr are no longer
here to suffer through this assault on traditional Christian marriages.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.