![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matthew S. Whiting wrote: Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off twice a year. That is truly good to know. Are annual increases merit based or COLA? What are the promotion criteria? Annual increases are the same as what every Social Security recipient gets. Usually in the 3-4% range, next year however it is about 2.5%. There are also increases based on your localities cost of living also added onto that. As for promotion I do not get promoted unless I put myself in a pool for a particular job opening. For example if Denver needs a controller or three that job will get posted for everyone to see. If I am interested in moving to Denver I will submit my paperwork. I may or may not get selected, none of the criteria is based simply upon years of experience. All promotions entail a paid move. Under no circumstances will I get to work one day and find I have been promoted to either another facility or into management of my current facility. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Matthew S. Whiting wrote: Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off twice a year. That is truly good to know. Are annual increases merit based or COLA? What are the promotion criteria? Annual increases are the same as what every Social Security recipient gets. Usually in the 3-4% range, next year however it is about 2.5%. There are also increases based on your localities cost of living also added onto that. As for promotion I do not get promoted unless I put myself in a pool for a particular job opening. For example if Denver needs a controller or three that job will get posted for everyone to see. If I am interested in moving to Denver I will submit my paperwork. I may or may not get selected, none of the criteria is based simply upon years of experience. All promotions entail a paid move. Under no circumstances will I get to work one day and find I have been promoted to either another facility or into management of my current facility. Where I work, our annual raises are called "merit increases" and are quite variable from 0% to upwards of 10% based on your performance for the year. Likewise, promotions are based on performance and increased scope of responsibility (the ATC equivalent is probably working a larger or busier airport or sector). We don't get COLAs and seniority plays no role in our pay increases beyond the fact that experience should add to your competence to some degree at least. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message news:aIrub.236709$Tr4.696802@attbi_s03... Matthew S. Whiting wrote: Because most private companies that perform functions similar to governmental agencies are more efficient. I think new technology would be adopted faster and with less bureaucracy. I think controller performance would be rewarded more effectively. Last I knew, most civil service jobs still had a lot of focus on seniority, more like a union workforce in the private sector than a professional workforce in the private sector. Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off twice a year. Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom S." wrote in message ... Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. Not when it isn't the driving force in anything but vacation days. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Tom S." wrote in message ... Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. Not when it isn't the driving force in anything but vacation days. Riggggghhhttt!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom S. wrote: Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off twice a year. Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. I am not in the union. The only thing based on seniority is the order in which you get to pick your days off every 6 months. The union local used to get to set their own seniority policy for their own facility. NATCA National put the kabosh on that several years ago and now we are all under the same seniority policy nationwide. There are only 5 union members at BIL ATCT out of 18 controllers. I will say that the FAA has bent over and let NATCA run ATC for many years now but as far as seniority goes it ain't nuthin' like say the UAW. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message
news:lkCub.180151$mZ5.1290067@attbi_s54... Tom S. wrote: Seniority is a nonfactor at the FAA. We only use it to bid our days off twice a year. Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. I am not in the union. The only thing based on seniority is the order in which you get to pick your days off every 6 months. The union local used to get to set their own seniority policy for their own facility. NATCA National put the kabosh on that several years ago and now we are all under the same seniority policy nationwide. There are only 5 union members at BIL ATCT out of 18 controllers. I will say that the FAA has bent over and let NATCA run ATC for many years now but as far as seniority goes it ain't nuthin' like say the UAW. That's because, as Reagan proved in 1981, federal unions such as PATCO and NATCA are toothless tigers because they cannot strike. Their sole power resides in their ability to convince management by the logical force of argument - and we all know how well that works if management doesn't want to cooperate - or lobbying for political support on Capitol Hill. NATCA's expensive PR campaign to influence Congress in the FAA Reauthorization Bill, necessitated by the loss of the political support that they enjoyed during the Clinton years, proves that point. All of which confirms your response to Tom Ass that he has no clue about federal unions. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Mazor wrote: That's because, as Reagan proved in 1981, federal unions such as PATCO and NATCA are toothless tigers because they cannot strike. Their sole power resides in their ability to convince management by the logical force of argument - and we all know how well that works if management doesn't want to cooperate - or lobbying for political support on Capitol Hill. NATCA just goes right over the head of management and directly to Congress. NATCA's expensive PR campaign to influence Congress in the FAA Reauthorization Bill, necessitated by the loss of the political support that they enjoyed during the Clinton years, proves that point. NATCA is always going to Congress about something or other. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom S." wrote: Bull!! Seniority is a major (the major?) key in any bureaucracy or Union. It certainly was not a factor in the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, of which I was a member in the '70s. George Patterson The actions taken by the New Hampshire Episcopalians (ie. inducting a gay bishop) are an affront to Christians everywhere. I am just thankful that the church's founder, Henry VIII, and his wife Catherine of Aragon, and his wife Anne Boleyn, and his wife Jane Seymour, and his wife Anne of Cleves, and his wife Katherine Howard, and his wife Catherine Parr are no longer here to suffer through this assault on traditional Christian marriages. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|