![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:02:47 GMT, Neil Gould wrote:
Of course, in 15 years, when China (or a nuclear armed Iran) is invading someone, I'll be probably be plenty glad we've got the F/A-22. Hmm. That sounds like an unlikely scenario for many reasons, not the least of which is that in 15 years, China may be building those for us just as they're building some of Boeing's fleet, now. Seriously, if we haven't figured out how to peacefully resolve disputes with civilized nations by then, the Raptor isn't likely to be of much help. and China has no need to attack the US. China only has to wait, time is on their side. they will (and already are) outnumber the US. #m -- The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents. -- Nathaniel Borenstein |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Martin Hotze wrote: On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:02:47 GMT, Neil Gould wrote: and China has no need to attack the US. China only has to wait, time is on their side. they will (and already are) outnumber the US. The issue is Taiwan. In principle it's similar to East and West Germany in that everyone would like reunification but on somewhat opposite terms. The Taiwanese would prefer to wait for the Communists to liberalize more, while the Communists see it as a matter of national sovereignty. The key here is time. If the PLA can land large numbers of troops on Taiwan, they win. If they can't, the mainland government will go up in flames. So an invasion needs to be a pretty sure thing which requires high force superiority. The longer it takes to get across, the more US reinforcements arrive and the harder the job gets. Every F-22 we have forces the Chinese to buy/build 5-10 more conventional fighters, which takes time and money. The longer it takes for the PLA to achieve sufficient superiority, the more time everyone has to find a political solution. I can understan where resentment of the US comes from and it's not entirely misplaced. But anyone who thinks a world where the current Chinese leadership will produce a net increase in human rights is in for a real nasty surprise. -cwk. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every F-22 we have forces the Chinese to buy/build 5-10 more
conventional fighters, which takes time and money. The longer it takes for the PLA to achieve sufficient superiority, the more time everyone has to find a political solution. .... and the weaker one side gets w.r.t the other. So it's not about finding a (political) solution, it's politics to enourage one solution over another. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eagle cam (link to micro-cam mounted on golden eagle) | J Crawford | Soaring | 5 | February 22nd 05 12:23 PM |
Christen Eagle Wings & Kits | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 0 | December 18th 04 09:02 PM |
FS: 1992 "McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle" Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 25th 04 06:12 AM |
CSC DUATS Golden Eagle FlightPrep® | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | June 26th 04 02:16 PM |
Golden Eagle Flight Prep | Mike Adams | Piloting | 0 | May 17th 04 01:36 AM |