![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Neil Gould" wrote:
I also think landing with 30 minutes of fuel is too little. So, how much is enough? Let's assume we can agree on an hour, which in a 180 HP PA-28 means about 8 gallons. You take off with 48 usable and fly for 5 hours, leaving an estimated 8 gallons left. Which is a more useful configuration to have at this point, an estimated 4 gallons usable remaining in each tank, or an estimated 8 gallons usable in one tank and the other one dry? I would feel more comfortable with 4 in each tank than with a dry tank. Let's examine that. We're comparing the relative risk of two events. Event 1 is that the fuel selector valve fails when you go to switch to the tank containing the remaining 8 gallons. Event 2 is that your estimate of how much fuel is left in the tank is wrong by 4 gallons (16%). Which is more likely? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Roy Smith posted:
"Neil Gould" wrote: I would feel more comfortable with 4 in each tank than with a dry tank. Let's examine that. We're comparing the relative risk of two events. Event 1 is that the fuel selector valve fails when you go to switch to the tank containing the remaining 8 gallons. Event 2 is that your estimate of how much fuel is left in the tank is wrong by 4 gallons (16%). Which is more likely? Talk about straw men! If the *only* risk in running a tank dry in flight was the fuel selector valve failing -- probably the *least* likely thing to happen -- there wouldn't be much point in this discussion, would there? Yet, a variant on the "least likely thing to happen" happened to me in flight. OTOH, my fuel consumption estimates have NEVER been off by 4 gallons (which is closer to between 20-25% in the planes that I fly, btw). So, what can be concluded from this data? IMO, nada. I recently read an article by a pilot that ferries aircraft between Hawaii and Australia. Part of his prep was to test actual fuel flow in flight, because the jump would necessitate reliance on the reserves. He didn't mention doing it by running a tank dry in flight. In the flying that I do, there is no direction that I can go where there isn't fuel well within the range of the plane's fuel capacity without considering reserves. So, I plan accordingly. You can fly however you wish. I just see no point in unnecessarily pushing limits. Regards, Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Engine running again, the good, bad and ugly | Corky Scott | Home Built | 34 | July 6th 05 05:04 PM |
It's finally running! | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | April 29th 05 04:53 PM |
Rotax 503 won't stop running | Tracy | Home Built | 2 | March 28th 04 04:56 PM |
Leaving all engines running at the gate | John | Piloting | 12 | February 5th 04 03:46 AM |