A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old August 22nd 05, 06:40 PM
LCT Paintball
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As with sound canceling headphones, this would only work locally - as in
needing different cancelation waveforms for each side of the head. The
film
would have to be a checkerboard of detectors and generators.


This has been modified for your right ear.


  #3  
Old August 23rd 05, 11:15 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No reason why not a piezoelectric material will both tramsmit and
receive. In fact intelligent skin is very biological. It has evolved
independently many times. Dolphins and sharks have intelligent skin.
So, presumably, did Ichtheosaurs, although skin is not in the fossil
record.

  #5  
Old August 24th 05, 09:17 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

True. However we can divide our material up. There is clearly a lot of
room for research. To illustrate the potential benefits of research let
me make a biological statement. Water is 1000 times denser than air (at
2,000m altitude). Dolphins and sharks swim at up to 70km/h. Putting
ther same energy in in air would = 700km/hr. Just a bit slower than a
passenger jet.

The Dolphin/Shark at pek energy will probably rougly equal a modern
250cc motobike engine. This is typical of microlight propulsion.
700km/h - Think about it.

I also feel that aircraft of all types would benefit, not just
microlights although for reasons of cost they make the best
experimental machimes. An airliner would have a lower optimal operating
altitude as induced drag (caused by the fact that the plane has got to
impart 9.81M m/s momentum downwards to fly. Induced drag goes down
with air mass swept.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who does flight plans? Michael 182 Piloting 158 July 4th 05 02:50 AM
Lift Query Avril Poisson General Aviation 8 April 21st 05 07:50 PM
Tamed by the Tailwheel [email protected] Piloting 84 January 18th 05 04:08 PM
A Level 1 AOA clarification Ramapriya Piloting 64 January 9th 05 01:19 AM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.