![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry for dragging this thing on but part (a) of the paragraph you
quoted (FAR 91.155) says that if the weather conditions (visibility, and cloud clearance) are below the prescribed minimums, you cannot "operate an aircraft under VFR" unless you go Special VFR. The weather minimums in paragraph 91.155(a) only refer to classes of airspace not only to those around an airport. You are correct about FAR 91.155(c,d). However, this rule is in addition to the other parts of section 91.155. Since the original poster was on a GPS approach, and most certainly in controlled airspace, he could have requested a Special VFR clearance and landed as long as he operated clear of clouds and flight visibility was greater than 3SM. Even though the airport does not have an official weather reporting systems, the FARs authorize the pilot to use his/her own judgment in determining visibility. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gman" wrote in message oups.com... I'm sorry for dragging this thing on but part (a) of the paragraph you quoted (FAR 91.155) says that if the weather conditions (visibility, and cloud clearance) are below the prescribed minimums, you cannot "operate an aircraft under VFR" unless you go Special VFR. The weather minimums in paragraph 91.155(a) only refer to classes of airspace not only to those around an airport. You are correct about FAR 91.155(c,d). However, this rule is in addition to the other parts of section 91.155. Since the original poster was on a GPS approach, and most certainly in controlled airspace, he could have requested a Special VFR clearance and landed as long as he operated clear of clouds and flight visibility was greater than 3SM. Even though the airport does not have an official weather reporting systems, the FARs authorize the pilot to use his/her own judgment in determining visibility. Since the original poster told us there was no weather reporting at the destination airport we can conclude there is no surface area because weather reporting is required to establish a surface area. Since SVFR exists only in a surface area we can conclude that SVFR was not available even if he had requested it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But FAR 91.155(c) says: "_EXCEPT_ as provided in =A791.157, no person
may operate an aircraft beneath the ceiling under VFR within the lateral boundaries of controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport...." That means if you flying under 91.157 (i.e. Special VFR) you need not comply with 91.155. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gman" wrote in message oups.com... But FAR 91.155(c) says: "_EXCEPT_ as provided in §91.157, no person may operate an aircraft beneath the ceiling under VFR within the lateral boundaries of controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport...." That means if you flying under 91.157 (i.e. Special VFR) you need not comply with 91.155. Where can you fly under FAR 91.157? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASW19b best descent rate on approach (full airbrakes) | Robert Sharpe | Soaring | 1 | April 30th 05 11:41 AM |
descent below minimums | hsm | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | January 11th 05 06:33 PM |
BRS and descent rate | Roger Long | Piloting | 21 | May 7th 04 05:34 PM |
Avoiding Shock Cooling in Quick Descent | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 32 | January 21st 04 04:32 AM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |