![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Dighera wrote:
The windfall Profits Tax was enacted as law when OPEC raised oil prices in 1979. If that policy made sense to lawmakers then, why wouldn't it be valid now? Why should domestic oil producers reap unearned millions in profits at the expense of the American people just because OPEC wants to price gouge?* It's not crude price increases which are causing the increase in oil industry profits lately. It's world demand for refined product (we have to import actual gasoline now, too), and limited refinery capacity in this country -- a supply-demand problem. The gov't could easily cause refineries to be built with changes in environmental regulations, so the cause of the "windfall profits" is essentially -- our gov't! *Your reference is to Rep. Dennis the Menace Kucinich, our hometown, nut-case legislator here, and his proposed tax. He has no problem with taxing us (the tax would be passed through to us!) and spending it on pork-barrel stuff and in effect a tax subsidy to foreign auto producers. Fred F. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not crude price increases which are causing the increase in oil
industry profits lately. It's world demand for refined product (we have to import actual gasoline now, too), and limited refinery capacity in this country -- a supply-demand problem. The gov't could easily cause refineries to be built with changes in environmental regulations, so the cause of the "windfall profits" is essentially -- our gov't! Well said. We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S. It's insane, but it's the law. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:34:49 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: It's not crude price increases which are causing the increase in oil industry profits lately. It's world demand for refined product (we have to import actual gasoline now, too), and limited refinery capacity in this country -- a supply-demand problem. The gov't could easily cause refineries to be built with changes in environmental regulations, so the cause of the "windfall profits" is essentially -- our gov't! Well said. We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S. It's insane, but it's the law. Nah. It's the Nimbys. Refineries lower property values. I like W's suggestion to use old military bases for refineries. They're already superfund sites. Don (Onizuka AFB's shutting according to this morning's news. Too small for a refinery, though. I hope that eventually Moffet winds up as a reliever and we can sneak in there when Palo Alto closes. We need to keep Moffet operational for a few more years until the companies around here start to need parking for their VLJs.). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:34:49 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote in ZJ5Pe.62754$084.27147@attbi_s22:: We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S. It's insane, but it's the law. So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up wind of your abode? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:34:49 GMT, "Jay Honeck" wrote in ZJ5Pe.62754$084.27147@attbi_s22:: We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S. It's insane, but it's the law. So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up wind of your abode? I wouldn't mind at all. As a matter of fact I'd welcome it. At this very moment there is a very old refinery 1.13 miles (as the Skyhawk flies) away from my house and I can't remember the last time I smelled anything from it. Now, when I was growing up the place regularly put out an odor that would curl your toes but over the last 20 years it has cleaned up nicely. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's insane, but it's the law.
So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up wind of your abode? I wouldn't mind at all. As a matter of fact I'd welcome it. At this very moment there is a very old refinery 1.13 miles (as the Skyhawk flies) away from my house and I can't remember the last time I smelled anything from it. Now, when I was growing up the place regularly put out an odor that would curl your toes but over the last 20 years it has cleaned up nicely. Unfortunately, it's that "nice odor" (or lack thereof) that cost billions, and has made it economically impossible for any oil company to build a new refinery. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Unfortunately, it's that "nice odor" (or lack thereof) that cost billions, and has made it economically impossible for any oil company to build a new refinery. At some point, petroleum products will cost enough to make it economically feasible again. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, it's that "nice odor" (or lack thereof) that cost billions,
and has made it economically impossible for any oil company to build a new refinery. .... and that's a Good Thing. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose opined
Unfortunately, it's that "nice odor" (or lack thereof) that cost billions, and has made it economically impossible for any oil company to build a new refinery. ... and that's a Good Thing. Nobody says that it is a bad thing... But it is an expensive thing ![]() -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-08-26, Jay Honeck wrote:
Unfortunately, it's that "nice odor" (or lack thereof) that cost billions, and has made it economically impossible for any oil company to build a new refinery. I'd rather pay a bit more money for my avgas than have to smell the stink of refineries. Even with current regulations, the air in the area of Houston I used to live turned green some days. The DE that I did my instrument ride with told me it used to be much worse - the premature deaths, rivers catching on fire, no fish in the bay etc. when he used to live in nearby Beaumont (another refinery town). The EPA regulations if anything need to be stricter still. In any case, it's not economically impossible to build a new refinery. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
no RPM drop on mag check | Dave Butler | Owning | 19 | November 2nd 04 02:55 AM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |