![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andreas Maurer" wrote in message ... How many times have you praised yourself for having instruments on board that do not need electricity to work properly? ![]() I did that dozens of times - electricity is definitely not a reliable thing in gliders. Bye Andreas This amazes me. Electricity not reliable? I know this is "conventional wisdom" but, I have never had an electronic device fail in flight but many, many mechanical instruments have failed me. In fact, even when an electronic device seemed to fail, it was always a mechanical switch or battery contact that failed and not the device itself. (Hint: Use the best electrical hardware money can buy.) I sit here typing on an incredibly complex device called a Personal Computer. The CPU alone has over 10 million transistors in it. If the PC ever fails, the reason will almost certainly be the mechanical hard drive. If the power grid fails to provide electricity, the UPS will keep it running long enough for a graceful shutdown. In just the last month, we have had a mechanical altimeter fail. The only way we knew was that it couldn't be set to local field elevation. We had an airspeed indicator fail to work at all. I had mechanical altimeter suddenly lose 2000 feet as it became unstuck. The Winter mechanical vario in one glider spends most of the time stuck at +10 Kts. so we rely on the only reliable one - the Cambridge L-Nav. (If I ask, "Why the mechanical vario", I hear, "For backup".) Mechanical instruments are neither rugged nor reliable. Mike Borgelt makes an excellent case for using his B40 with it's internal 9V battery as a backup. Unlike the Winter, it has audio even while running on the internal battery. As for readability, I don't think you will find a "three hand" altimeter in an airliner anymore. They have had drum-type digital displays since sometime in the 1960's. Many studies have shown the digital readout is harder to mis-read. Although, today these are likely to be just the back-up to the digital "glass cockpit". Bill Daniels |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
This amazes me. Electricity not reliable? I know this is "conventional wisdom" but, I have never had an electronic device fail in flight but many, I had the battery fail twice on me: During my first 300km flight and during my second 300km flight. Which meant that I had done two successful 300km flights without GPS and acoustic vario, but none of them was logged. :-P Stefan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stefan" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: This amazes me. Electricity not reliable? I know this is "conventional wisdom" but, I have never had an electronic device fail in flight but many, I had the battery fail twice on me: During my first 300km flight and during my second 300km flight. Which meant that I had done two successful 300km flights without GPS and acoustic vario, but none of them was logged. :-P Stefan, buy a new battery. They are cheap these days. At least, much cheaper than a failed 300Km attempt. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll second the use of the B40 as a backup. I don't have a mechanical vario
at all. As a precaution, I change the B40 internal battery on the same schedule as the one on the MH Oxygen system, wasteful perhaps, but reassuring. Ray Warshaw 1LK "Bill Daniels" wrote in message ... "Andreas Maurer" wrote in message ... How many times have you praised yourself for having instruments on board that do not need electricity to work properly? ![]() I did that dozens of times - electricity is definitely not a reliable thing in gliders. Bye Andreas This amazes me. Electricity not reliable? I know this is "conventional wisdom" but, I have never had an electronic device fail in flight but many, many mechanical instruments have failed me. In fact, even when an electronic device seemed to fail, it was always a mechanical switch or battery contact that failed and not the device itself. (Hint: Use the best electrical hardware money can buy.) I sit here typing on an incredibly complex device called a Personal Computer. The CPU alone has over 10 million transistors in it. If the PC ever fails, the reason will almost certainly be the mechanical hard drive. If the power grid fails to provide electricity, the UPS will keep it running long enough for a graceful shutdown. In just the last month, we have had a mechanical altimeter fail. The only way we knew was that it couldn't be set to local field elevation. We had an airspeed indicator fail to work at all. I had mechanical altimeter suddenly lose 2000 feet as it became unstuck. The Winter mechanical vario in one glider spends most of the time stuck at +10 Kts. so we rely on the only reliable one - the Cambridge L-Nav. (If I ask, "Why the mechanical vario", I hear, "For backup".) Mechanical instruments are neither rugged nor reliable. Mike Borgelt makes an excellent case for using his B40 with it's internal 9V battery as a backup. Unlike the Winter, it has audio even while running on the internal battery. As for readability, I don't think you will find a "three hand" altimeter in an airliner anymore. They have had drum-type digital displays since sometime in the 1960's. Many studies have shown the digital readout is harder to mis-read. Although, today these are likely to be just the back-up to the digital "glass cockpit". Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:17:23 -0600, "Bill Daniels"
wrote: This amazes me. Electricity not reliable? I know this is "conventional wisdom" but, I have never had an electronic device fail in flight but many, many mechanical instruments have failed me. Glad that you never had a problem. ![]() I have lost count of the numbers where my clubs glider's batteries were forgotten to charge after flight or ran out of energy because they had reached their service life... Not to mention more than a couple of GPS failures over the years... ![]() Of course - there have been more than a couple of mechanical (Winter) altimeter failures, too - but at least the altimeter didn't stop working at all but only lost precision. It's pretty impossible to convince me of the superiority of something that needs to be charged as long as more than one owner is involved. This includes a backup battery. vbg Bye Andreas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:43:46 +0200, "Bert Willing"
wrote: Well, even if there is only one owner involved, I'm not going to rely on electrically power instruments only. Never.^ I still remember one competition back in 1991 when the US shut down GPS and suddenly a gaggle of 30 standard class gliders lost their navigation in the vicinity of Sobernheim (several airbases and restricted airspace there). I got to know a new definition of the term "confusion". Bye Andreas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metric measuring tool source? | DL152279546231 | Home Built | 12 | April 29th 04 02:13 AM |
Reverse Vacuum Damging to Instruments? | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 8 | February 16th 04 04:00 AM |
metric system newsgroup call for votes #1 | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 72 | November 16th 03 06:59 PM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |
Wanted - Metric Altimeters | RHWOODY | Soaring | 0 | September 13th 03 10:20 PM |