A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Student Drop-Out Rates...why?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 26th 05, 06:27 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote \

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location
for a new refinery or ten.


Problem there is the fact that a supertanker doesn't fit too well in the
Great Lakes locks, and that means no good way to get all of the crude up
there, needed for the refinery to work well. (or at all) :-)
--
Jim in NC

  #2  
Old August 27th 05, 06:12 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:27:37 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Jay Honeck" wrote \

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location
for a new refinery or ten.


Problem there is the fact that a supertanker doesn't fit too well in the
Great Lakes locks, and that means no good way to get all of the crude up
there, needed for the refinery to work well. (or at all) :-)


There's plans for a new/additional lock, but I don't think you can get
super tankers as far as the Great Lakes. Maybe, but I don't recall
any really wide boats/ships on them.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #3  
Old August 27th 05, 08:12 PM
sfb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Can we say ice? The Great Lakes freeze up in the winter. For historical
reasons, all the oil and gas is barged up the Hudson River from New York
City to Albany. The Coast Guard makes a major effort to keep a channel
open in the winter.

"Roger" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:27:37 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Jay Honeck" wrote \

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see
mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and
used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect
location
for a new refinery or ten.


Problem there is the fact that a supertanker doesn't fit too well in
the
Great Lakes locks, and that means no good way to get all of the crude
up
there, needed for the refinery to work well. (or at all) :-)


There's plans for a new/additional lock, but I don't think you can get
super tankers as far as the Great Lakes. Maybe, but I don't recall
any really wide boats/ships on them.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com



  #4  
Old August 26th 05, 11:47 AM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-08-26, Jay Honeck wrote:
One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location
for a new refinery or ten.


Erm, there's a reason why all the oil refineries are in places like
Houston and Beaumont, and not in the mid-West.

It would be nice if our supposed "oil president" would issue an executive
order mandating construction of new refineries, pronto -- environmental
restrictions be damned.


Ah. Rape, pillage, poison the earth! And of course, cause premature
death to anyone living downwind.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #5  
Old August 27th 05, 06:22 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:03:55 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations
make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S.

It's insane, but it's the law.


And what would you run through them once you built them?
If you want to see the price of crude really go up, just add more
refinery capacity. Of course that would increase our dependency on
foreign oil even more.

We don't need more refinery capacity, we need to use less


So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up
wind of your abode?


Depends on how far upwind.

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location


What do you mean used to? I flew down through there last summer and
it was darn near IFR on a sunshiny day. I was actually thinking about
filing when it started clearing up as I got to the south of Gary. It
was making me cough at 5,000 feet. Admittedly it's nothing like it
was back in the 60s and 70s but it's still a highly polluted area.
Yes, I'm familiar with what it used to be like as I had an uncle who
worked down there.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #6  
Old August 27th 05, 09:43 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why would this be good? Who would it be good for? How would you get the
crude to Gary Indiana?

You don't get it. It is not enviornmental regulation that is preventing new
refineries from being constructed.

Mike
MU-2


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:LwwPe.279601$x96.198470@attbi_s72...
We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations
make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S.

It's insane, but it's the law.


So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up
wind of your abode?


Depends on how far upwind.

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location
for a new refinery or ten.

It would be nice if our supposed "oil president" would issue an executive
order mandating construction of new refineries, pronto -- environmental
restrictions be damned. Of course, it would be tied up in the courts for
the next 15 years, and nothing would get done.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



  #7  
Old August 28th 05, 12:38 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
Why would this be good? Who would it be good for? How would you get the
crude to Gary Indiana?


Barge up the Mississippi then Pipeline. At one time there were many
refineries in the area. Only one left is Mobil AIR. Most burned and it is
not economical to rebuild them for the reasons Jay mentioned.

You don't get it. It is not enviornmental regulation that is preventing

new
refineries from being constructed.

Mike
MU-2



  #8  
Old August 28th 05, 08:44 PM
Jimmy B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Rapoport wrote:
Why would this be good? Who would it be good for? How would you get the
crude to Gary Indiana?

You don't get it. It is not enviornmental regulation that is preventing new
refineries from being constructed.


What is preventing new refineries? (Sorry, I keep getting lost in the
thread.)



Mike
MU-2


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:LwwPe.279601$x96.198470@attbi_s72...

We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA regulations
make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S.

It's insane, but it's the law.

So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up
wind of your abode?


Depends on how far upwind.

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect location
for a new refinery or ten.

It would be nice if our supposed "oil president" would issue an executive
order mandating construction of new refineries, pronto -- environmental
restrictions be damned. Of course, it would be tied up in the courts for
the next 15 years, and nothing would get done.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"




  #9  
Old August 28th 05, 09:19 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some are contending that enviornmental regulations are "preventing" the
constructions of new refineries.

Mike
MU-2


"Jimmy B." wrote in message
ink.net...
Mike Rapoport wrote:
Why would this be good? Who would it be good for? How would you get the
crude to Gary Indiana?

You don't get it. It is not enviornmental regulation that is preventing
new refineries from being constructed.


What is preventing new refineries? (Sorry, I keep getting lost in the
thread.)



Mike
MU-2


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:LwwPe.279601$x96.198470@attbi_s72...

We are dangerously low on refinery capacity, and current EPA
regulations
make it essentially impossible to build any more in the U.S.

It's insane, but it's the law.

So you wouldn't have any problem with a new refinery coming on-line up
wind of your abode?

Depends on how far upwind.

One idea: If you've ever driven past Gary, Indiana, you would see mile
after mile of abandoned steel mills (that employed thousands, and used to
stink to holy heaven when I was a boy). That would be a perfect
location for a new refinery or ten.

It would be nice if our supposed "oil president" would issue an executive
order mandating construction of new refineries, pronto -- environmental
restrictions be damned. Of course, it would be tied up in the courts for
the next 15 years, and nothing would get done.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"




  #10  
Old August 28th 05, 09:34 PM
TaxSrv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some are contending that enviornmental regulations are "preventing"
the
constructions of new refineries.

Mike
MU-2


It's all about money. Environmental regulation costs, citizen lawsuits,
cost to just build. Meanwhile, they make money on tight supplies, and
the industry now is very happy. With the concentration in this industry
among a few big players, no one is motivated to make the first move,
which will put them at a competitive disadvantage, I guess. Make sense?

Fred F.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
no RPM drop on mag check Dave Butler Owning 19 November 2nd 04 02:55 AM
Another Frustrated Student Pilot OutofRudder Piloting 13 January 24th 04 02:20 AM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM
Retroactive correction of logbook errors Marty Ross Piloting 10 July 31st 03 06:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.