![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
This is correct only if "the number in the middle" means half of the sequence of numbers are below it and half are above it. Actually half the numbers are less than or equal to it and half are greater than or equal to it. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Icebound wrote:
Does not the Recreational, with a cross-country endorsement, give pretty much everything the SP certificate gives, including the lesser medical requirement? Nope. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-08-24, Jay Honeck wrote:
It doesn't matter how desirable something is to someone who can't afford it or how affordable something is to someone who doesn't want it, desire and resources have to match. Aviation doesn't appeal to many of those who can afford it. WHY? Aviation doesn't appeal, period. Being in the air is NOT our natural habitat. I'm coming more to the conclusion that myself and my fellow pilots, aviators, skydivers (particularly skydivers), hang glider pilots, glider pilots - any sort of aviator at all, aren't really wired quite the same way as everyone else. Everyone else instincively knows that being more than a few feet AGL is not natural and rather dumb, and only tolerate airline travel because it's the only way to get some places and you are so insulated fand distracted from the actual going up in the air bit, they can ignore for a few hours that they are not firmly attached to the ground. Anything that reminds them of this (the tiniest bit of turbulence, for example) makes them anxious (and makes some of them whimper). We didn't evolve as an airborne species. It is totally alien. To subject yourself to this voluntarily is, in the subconscious lizard-mind totally insane. So they don't do it. There is only a tiny proportion of the population who doesn't subconsicously find the idea of flying around many thousands of feet from their natural habitat deeply disturbing. When an aviator stands on top of a large hill, at least part of them is thinking "Wouldn't it be cool to run down here with a hang-glider...". When a normal person stands on top of a big hill, they think "It'd really suck to trip right now". At least subconsicously. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rapoport wrote:
What is a "wuffo" "Wuffo" you jumpin outa that airplane? |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
Aviation doesn't appeal, period. Being in the air is NOT our natural habitat. I'm not even going to ask you opinion about submariners! :-)) |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:LQaPe.3479$SW1.2859@trndny09... TaxSrv wrote: Refineries are like anything else, there are too many of them so nobody builds any more. I'm not an expert on this industry either, but do you have a source for the above? Is the industry lying when they say that at peak demand, refineries are generally at capacity? From what I've read, we are at a period of running at capacity. Which means that we are getting close to a period in which (as Mike put it) "the market grows and there is a shortage." Which will be followed by a period in which (as Mike put it) "Then everybody builds more and there is a glut again." Except they haven't built a new one in about 30 years, and they've closed (how many) in those 30 some odd years. |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:46:58 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: Jim wrote: This is correct only if "the number in the middle" means half of the sequence of numbers are below it and half are above it. Actually half the numbers are less than or equal to it and half are greater than or equal to it. Much better. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dylan Smith wrote: On 2005-08-25, wrote: Move out of New Jersey. Work as a consultant and you can live anywhere you can get a high-speed internet connection. No commute necessary and real estate costs a lot less. I hire developers and sales people almost Trouble is - if as a computer professional you have a job where you telecommute (or can telecommute), so can someone from India at a tenth of your salary. If you want work which gives you the stability to own and continue to fly an aircraft, you need a job that requires at least reasonable frequent physical presence so you don't get outsourced. The real-world picture is a bit more complicated than this. Working with offshore resources costs a lot more than just the salary of the guy in Bangalore. If you're contracting resources in small volume, reasonably-skilled people can easily cost $2500/month, and in order to get the job done you will probably need an in-country project manager who costs another $2500. So a three-man shop costs $10k/mo. In many cases you could do the same job here in the US with 2 good coders who can manage themselves, live in your time zone, and understand American business. You won't find good people for $60k/year who live in the Manhattan area, but you might find them in Florida, Texas, or Idaho where everything costs half as much and there's no income tax. Companies like GE or Accenture can push rates lower because of scale, but most companies are not able to support those kinds of operations. Not to mention that there are still many projects where cultural knowledge that any American resident has will make things go much, much easier. There is and always will be a place in the picture for American IT workers. -cwk. |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent grammar and punctuation, but some wrong facts. Idaho's PIT kicks
in a $1,129 at a rate of 1.6% and rachets up to 7.8% at $22,577. You were correct that Texas and FLA have no income tax. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
no RPM drop on mag check | Dave Butler | Owning | 19 | November 2nd 04 02:55 AM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |