Rocks Thrown at Border Patrol Chopper

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:RdEPe.281342$x96.23410@attbi_s72...
That's incorrect. We interview Hispanic women all the time (for
housekeeping openings -- their primary source of income, methinks), and
require that each applicant list their Social Security number on their
application.

There is a phone number to call to verify any SS number. If it's not
valid, the person at the other end tells us that "This person should
contact the Social Security Administration, since there is something wrong
with their number." They don't really care if it indicates that the
person is an illegal alien.

In a perfect world, they would send the gendarmes over to arrest the
illegal -- I would be happy to cooperate -- but they have ZERO interest in
doing this. And apparently ZERO contact with any law enforcement agency.

The Federal Government is screwed up far beyond what the average person on
the street can imagine.


You know Jay, you are under no obligation to call that number? Your
obligation is to check the IDs that the person you have offered a job gives
you when you complete the I9. And the burden of if they are real is would a
reasonable person believe these IDs are real.

Also, if you are calling on just the Hispanic applicants you are
discriminating.

Aluckyguess wrote:
Sure they do they get a phony ID and then find a job and the employer takes
out the taxes and SSI . The employer doesnt even know they are ilegal.
If the employer finds out he has to fire the employee or he can be fined.

$10,000/person/day

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
I know where you are coming from Jay, my 1st wife was of hispanic
descent, father Nuevo Laredo, mexico and Mom from Bogota Columbia....and
they did not like the wide open borders either. Though my father in law
had a very good paying job he said the illegals kept the pay down for
Mexicans that were here legally.

Aluckyguess wrote:
I never thought about that but he was right.
I think the reason they let them in is they are funding our social security
system with phony ID's. They pay in but will never collect.

And there are people who are working to allow them to collect that money.

The ones that use real SS# also claim dependents of up to fourteen so
they get less deducted at each payday. After a year, they come back
with different SS# and these slimey employers know this and don't care.

Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone

The ones that use real SS# also claim dependents of up to fourteen so
they get less deducted at each payday. After a year, they come back
with different SS# and these slimey employers know this and don't care.

Why would they need to come back with a new SS #?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

They claim it(multiple dependents) on their W-4, but they don't file
tax return. Their weekly checks don't get taxed as much as if they
claimed 0 dependent. By not using the same SS#, they actually
disappear, (on paper). They come back as someone else or they piggy
back on some innocent person's SS#. That person will have to pay up in
the form of being evaluate as a person earning more than they really
earned.

Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone

Flyingmonk wrote:
They claim it(multiple dependents) on their W-4, but they don't file
tax return. Their weekly checks don't get taxed as much as if they
claimed 0 dependent. By not using the same SS#, they actually
disappear, (on paper). They come back as someone else or they piggy
back on some innocent person's SS#. That person will have to pay up in
the form of being evaluate as a person earning more than they really
earned.

Don't the extra "earnings" flag the IRS as under reported income when
the "owner" of the SSN files their 1040?

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
newsxvPe.282087$_o.58618@attbi_s71...
Perhaps we should arm the copter with machine guns and fire back?

No, that would be barbaric.

However, I am continually amazed at the vociferous opposition to actually
controlling our borders. For some reason the ACLU and a host of other
do-gooder organizations find it anathema for America to actually restrict
immigration to legal immigrants only -- a fact that baffles me.

We are friends with a family from Columbia. They came to America the hard
way -- legally -- and have struggled over the last decade with obtaining
green cards for their family members, and with becoming American citizens.
It has been a tough row to hoe, and they are rightfully proud of their
efforts and status.

They are also the most vocally anti-Mexican group of people I have EVER
known. Their attitude toward illegal immigrants borders on Fascist --
they
simply despise them for cheating and taking the easy way -- at what they
see
as their expense -- and I am sure they would advocate following this
poster's (I hope) tongue-in-cheek suggestion to arm the border patrol
helicopters with machine guns.

But what is so wrong with stopping illegal immigration? Why is it okay
to
fly helicopters up and down the Rio Grande 24/7 -- at huge expense -- but
building a fence is seen as some sort of "Berlin Wall"-type of deal?

Very simple.....votes. Upset the Latino community and its all over.

--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Very simple.....votes. Upset the Latino community and its all over.

Illegals can't vote.

Only US citizens can.

If the (legal) Latino community gets upset at the suggestion of tougher
border control, they are insulting their own people by implying all, or
most, Latinos are criminals.

Doh!

Frankie

"Frankie" wrote in message
k.net...
Very simple.....votes. Upset the Latino community and its all over.

Illegals can't vote.

Only US citizens can.

If the (legal) Latino community gets upset at the suggestion of tougher
border control, they are insulting their own people by implying all, or
most, Latinos are criminals.

Doh!

Frankie


Listen to the Latino community leaders. You are dead wrong. Every time
talk of closing the border is mentioned they get on the racist band wagon.