A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Save the Mustangs?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 26th 05, 03:49 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
nk.net...

"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
...


With 100, take off MP is reduced to 45 inches from the normal 61 as it
is. If they bring back 80 again, we'll probably have to drop the damn
things from a mother ship and start them in a dive!!
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Dudley Henriques


My understanding is that 100 octane was the best available at the
beginning of WWII, and due to capacity limitations on the high test

stuff,
100 octane was the standard fuel for most of the bomber force in Europe
during the war, while the fighters got the higher octane stuff. In

this
area, the allies had a huge advantage over the Axis, which relied on

lower
octane brews.

Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more power
on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today,
because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were
during the war.

KB


Yes, I know. :-)

So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load?


  #2  
Old August 26th 05, 04:28 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:49:10 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:

Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more power
on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today,
because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were
during the war.

KB


Yes, I know. :-)

So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load?


No ammo, no guns, no 75 gallon rear fuselage tank, no armor plate, no
hanging ordinance and no drop tanks. Did I miss anything? Oh yes, no
monster radio that sat behind the pilot.

Maybe no oxygen too, but that's just a guess.

Corky Scott

PS, some guys have the guns and ammo for show.

  #3  
Old August 27th 05, 03:52 AM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
nk.net...

"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
...


With 100, take off MP is reduced to 45 inches from the normal 61 as it
is. If they bring back 80 again, we'll probably have to drop the damn
things from a mother ship and start them in a dive!!
:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Dudley Henriques

My understanding is that 100 octane was the best available at the
beginning of WWII, and due to capacity limitations on the high test

stuff,
100 octane was the standard fuel for most of the bomber force in Europe
during the war, while the fighters got the higher octane stuff. In

this
area, the allies had a huge advantage over the Axis, which relied on

lower
octane brews.

Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more
power
on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today,
because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were
during the war.

KB


Yes, I know. :-)

So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load?


My bird was clean; no fuselage tank and no externals. Full fuel for me was
90 gals in each main. I used the ammo bays as luggage space for a clean
flight suit and a change of clothes (suit ) for those ever present rubber
chicken dinners the local chamber of commerce always gave for us at the
shows. :-)
Dudley


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I saved a life, maybe you can save mine. lifeguard Owning 3 July 18th 05 11:19 AM
FS 2004 with multiple monitors - how to save settings? Horst Walter Simulators 5 December 8th 04 01:29 PM
Cant save the downloaded real weather Mikker Simulators 1 September 16th 04 02:08 PM
Osan's 'Mustangs' wing gets new commander Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:48 PM
GPS Visualizer update: now you can "save your work" Adam Schneider Soaring 0 July 28th 03 09:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.