![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message nk.net... "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... With 100, take off MP is reduced to 45 inches from the normal 61 as it is. If they bring back 80 again, we'll probably have to drop the damn things from a mother ship and start them in a dive!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Dudley Henriques My understanding is that 100 octane was the best available at the beginning of WWII, and due to capacity limitations on the high test stuff, 100 octane was the standard fuel for most of the bomber force in Europe during the war, while the fighters got the higher octane stuff. In this area, the allies had a huge advantage over the Axis, which relied on lower octane brews. Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more power on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today, because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were during the war. KB Yes, I know. :-) So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:49:10 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more power on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today, because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were during the war. KB Yes, I know. :-) So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load? No ammo, no guns, no 75 gallon rear fuselage tank, no armor plate, no hanging ordinance and no drop tanks. Did I miss anything? Oh yes, no monster radio that sat behind the pilot. Maybe no oxygen too, but that's just a guess. Corky Scott PS, some guys have the guns and ammo for show. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message nk.net... "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... With 100, take off MP is reduced to 45 inches from the normal 61 as it is. If they bring back 80 again, we'll probably have to drop the damn things from a mother ship and start them in a dive!! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Dudley Henriques My understanding is that 100 octane was the best available at the beginning of WWII, and due to capacity limitations on the high test stuff, 100 octane was the standard fuel for most of the bomber force in Europe during the war, while the fighters got the higher octane stuff. In this area, the allies had a huge advantage over the Axis, which relied on lower octane brews. Bottom line, Merlins run fine on 100LL, but can generate much more power on 130 octane. Fortunately, the extra power isn't as necessary today, because Mustangs are flown at much lower weights today than they were during the war. KB Yes, I know. :-) So, what gives Dudley? You only carrying half an ammo load? My bird was clean; no fuselage tank and no externals. Full fuel for me was 90 gals in each main. I used the ammo bays as luggage space for a clean flight suit and a change of clothes (suit ) for those ever present rubber chicken dinners the local chamber of commerce always gave for us at the shows. :-) Dudley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I saved a life, maybe you can save mine. | lifeguard | Owning | 3 | July 18th 05 11:19 AM |
FS 2004 with multiple monitors - how to save settings? | Horst Walter | Simulators | 5 | December 8th 04 01:29 PM |
Cant save the downloaded real weather | Mikker | Simulators | 1 | September 16th 04 02:08 PM |
Osan's 'Mustangs' wing gets new commander | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 09:48 PM |
GPS Visualizer update: now you can "save your work" | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | July 28th 03 09:26 PM |