A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Odd clearance -- airway given twice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27th 05, 03:49 AM
Bill B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
The stock clearance into HPN from the POU area is IGN V157 HAARP. It's
been that for as long as I've been flying around here. Recently, they've
started issuing IGN V157 VALRE V157 HAARP, which boils down to exactly the
same thing (VALRE is just a bend in V157).

Today, I asked the controller about it. His response is that he just
reads
what gets printed on the strip, and they've been wondering the same thing
in the Tracon :-).

Does anybody have any idea why the ATC computer would be generating
clearances with the same airway mentioned twice?



Don't know if anyone's still looking at this post, but I have another
theory -- you used DUAT or DUATS to file the flight plan. Both of those
systems (I am a lead programmer for DTC's DUAT system) have a requirement to
make sure the route of flight is validated by the ARTCC host computer
system. There was a situation where the ARTCC computers were rejecting the
DUAT flight plans (about 12 years ago) because the ARTCC computers don't
have all of the U.S. fixes in their databases. The solution for the DUAT
systems was to insert a fix along an airway when the airway leaves the first
center's airspace and enters another center's airspace.

Once the DUAT system sent the flight plan into the FAA's systems, the
controller just reads off the route as they get it.


  #2  
Old September 17th 05, 04:03 AM
Shaun Eli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy, my guess is that ATC started doing that to prevent pilots from
just going Direct To HAARP with their GPS as soon as they pass IGN,
thus skipping the bend in the middle of the airway.

Shaun Eli
www.BrainChampagne.com
Brain Champagne: Clever Comedy for the Smart Mind (sm)

  #3  
Old September 19th 05, 08:56 AM
Lynne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.

  #4  
Old September 19th 05, 02:07 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Lynne wrote:
FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.


What? Never heard of that, and you'd think I would have.

  #5  
Old September 19th 05, 02:07 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
"Lynne" wrote:

FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.


That explains it, thanks. Any idea what the logic was behind that?
  #6  
Old September 19th 05, 07:53 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Roy Smith wrote:
In article . com,
"Lynne" wrote:


FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.



That explains it, thanks.





It doesn't explain anything because it isn't true.
  #7  
Old September 19th 05, 07:57 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lynne" wrote in message
ups.com...

FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.


Really? How interesting. Could you post a copy of that order? Do you know
when the new system for designating FAA orders went into effect?


  #8  
Old September 19th 05, 11:50 PM
Shaun Eli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lynne, thanks. Why within 75 miles of the departure airport? I'd
think that pilots would be MORE familiar with local bending airways
than with far-away ones. Or is an altitude consideration?

  #9  
Old September 20th 05, 12:12 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Shaun Eli" wrote in message
oups.com...

Lynne, thanks. Why within 75 miles of the departure airport? I'd
think that pilots would be MORE familiar with local bending airways
than with far-away ones. Or is an altitude consideration?


Lynne is a troll. There's no such requirement, no such FAA order.


  #10  
Old September 20th 05, 03:32 PM
Brad Zeigler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lynne" wrote in message
ups.com...
FAA order B3838347 dated 07/01/2005 requires Air Traffic Controllers to
read bends at airway fixes within 75 miles of the departure airport.
Probably, that is what is coming into play here.


Are you sure that order didn't go into effect on 4/1/2005?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 195 November 28th 05 10:06 PM
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U Judah Instrument Flight Rules 8 February 27th 04 06:02 PM
Victor Airways in Clearance Wyatt Emmerich Instrument Flight Rules 50 February 15th 04 06:42 PM
Q about lost comms on weird clearance Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 34 February 2nd 04 09:11 PM
Picking up a Clearance Airborne Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 03 01:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.