![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter" wrote in message ... We have a similar debate running here in the UK. The outfit that runs privatised ATC (NATS) reckons they spend some millions providing ATS services outside CAS, and they want to charge GA for it. There is a lot of resistance, unsuprisingly since GA in the UK is very small and is in a poor financial state. Also there is no obligation to use any service when OCAS. To top it, when one asks for a service, it is often not provided, or the one that is provided is Flight Info which is of almost zero value (no radar). Occassionally one can get radar, but much of the time it is refused. If NATS charged for ATS OCAS, they would then (it has been argued) be contractually bound to provide it, and they really hate that prospect. So the cost of provision ATS OCAS falls onto the airlines, and they don't like it (even though it is only a few million, about 1% of British Airways profit). Recently, a proposal for en route charges was abandoned. There was going to be a VFR and IFR charge, possibly. Currently only IFR over 2000kg MTOW pays, and that remains. The only way to collect or enforce a VFR flying charge would be an annual/quarterly lump sum. A lot of people thought Mode S (mandatory for IFR 2007, VFR 2009) will be used to spy on people for collecting en-route charges - but the required radar coverage doesn't exist by a very long way. It's all a bit silly since one can fly VFR anytime except at night, so 2000kg+ private operators can fly OCAS (even non-radio), or VFR anywhere if at all possible, to avoid paying. In Class G nobody cares what you do so you can be in IMC (which is always IFR) but if you don't tell anybody nobody will know - just as long as you can land "VFR". Not a good safety incentive... One UK CAA proposal was to stick the VFR (or sub-2000kg IFR) en route charge on the annual Radio License fee. That doesn't seem all that similar. In the US FSS primarily provides weather briefings, updates, and relays some ATC communications. Things that are either available now from private companies or could easily be automated. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off topic, Gore and the internet (don't read if not interested) | Corky Scott | Home Built | 42 | June 18th 05 04:06 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
US Election (in fact, on topic) | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 2 | October 31st 04 01:44 AM |
Off topic: Learning to Be Stupid | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | September 1st 03 10:21 PM |