A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Orleans Lakefront Airport



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 05, 11:48 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dan Luke wrote:
CNN video: NEW looks bad; partially under water. Heavy damage to most
buildings, particularly the large Millionaire FBO west of 18/36.

Wonder how long it will be before we make the $100 muffaletta trip to
Lakefront again--if indeed we ever do?


Make that $200, since the land-lubbers gas prices went from $2.77 to
$3.31, in 3 days.

JG

  #2  
Old September 1st 05, 01:28 AM
iflyatiger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HELLO !!



Has anybody watched the tv lately? Do you see what those poor people are
going thru..

For them it is a life and death situation.. Maybe we (including me)
shouldn't be so concerned about the price of gas right now.



Not aimed at anyone in particular, just something to think about..




  #3  
Old September 1st 05, 05:21 PM
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"iflyatiger" wrote in message
...
HELLO !!



Has anybody watched the tv lately? Do you see what those poor people are
going thru..

For them it is a life and death situation.. Maybe we (including me)
shouldn't be so concerned about the price of gas right now.



Not aimed at anyone in particular, just something to think about..




Yes the citizens of the New Orleans area are indeed suffering and there has
been many the off topic post here talking about helping them BUT the price
and availability of petro products is going to effect all of us including
them. There are some pretty bad worst case scenarios out there.



  #4  
Old September 2nd 05, 12:00 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote


Yes the citizens of the New Orleans area are indeed suffering and there

has
been many the off topic post here talking about helping them BUT the price
and availability of petro products is going to effect all of us including
them. There are some pretty bad worst case scenarios out there.


Damn straight. I don't like the price, but can and will pay it. When the
talk of massive shortages, due to the pipeline being down, and reduced
refinery output, you have to wonder if you will have enough gas to get to
work. What then?

We all need to start serious conservation, and NOW. To delay will only make
things worse.
--
Jim in NC
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old September 1st 05, 11:50 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote:

We all need to start serious conservation, and NOW. To delay will
only make
things worse.


Agree. An easy conservation move is simply to slow down. I'm driving
55--being passed by heedless nitwits still doing 80--until the current
unpleasantness is over.

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #6  
Old September 2nd 05, 12:52 AM
nrp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"An easy conservation move is simply to slow down. I'm driving
55--being passed........."

I completely agree. But why is it that if I even suggest it to anyone
they can't even understand the need for it. Either the supply has to
increase or the demand reduced to bring the price down - and neither is
happening. In that case only alternative is to raise the price.

At least fuel is still available. Price control etc would just make it
disappear from the market. Thank goodness no one is talking that -
except in Hawaii.

  #7  
Old September 2nd 05, 01:04 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nrp wrote:

"An easy conservation move is simply to slow down. I'm driving
55--being passed........."

I completely agree. But why is it that if I even suggest it to anyone
they can't even understand the need for it. Either the supply has to
increase or the demand reduced to bring the price down - and neither is
happening. In that case only alternative is to raise the price.

At least fuel is still available. Price control etc would just make it
disappear from the market. Thank goodness no one is talking that -
except in Hawaii.


As much as I hate paying $3.19 (today's price, up 40 cents in the last
two days), this is likely the best thing to ever happen here with regard
to energy. Maybe the urban and suburban folks will realize that farmers
need large pickups, but soccer moms and yuppies don't.

Also, it may, just may, spur the serious development of alternative
energy and transportation options. Then again, I'm probably being
optimistic.


Matt
  #8  
Old September 2nd 05, 01:56 AM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nrp wrote:
At least fuel is still available.


Hmmm??? Kinda makes one wonder if there really is a shortage, doesn't it?
If there were truely a shortage nationwide, wouldn't you expect many
stations to be closed?
How many gas stations in your area are closed because they cannot get gas?
  #9  
Old September 2nd 05, 03:58 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"nrp" wrote

At least fuel is still available.


That is not a given, in my area. The pipeline, we get most of our fuel
from, runs from Texas, through Louisiana, and Mississippi, among others, on
its way to the East coast. It is out of action, mainly due to no
electricity for the pumping stations. Tanker drivers are going from
terminal, to terminal, trying to find a place that will give them the fuel
that they need. When they do get fuel, it is not a full load.

I am deeply concerned, not only for the homeless along the coast, but for my
ability to be able to get to work, and for others and the economy around
here.

What will happen? I don't know.
--
Jim in NC

  #10  
Old September 2nd 05, 03:48 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Morgans" wrote:

We all need to start serious conservation, and NOW. To delay will
only make
things worse.


Agree. An easy conservation move is simply to slow down. I'm driving
55--being passed by heedless nitwits still doing 80--until the current
unpleasantness is over.


Me too, and carpooling, when possible.
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Palo Alto airport, potential long-term problems... [email protected] Piloting 7 June 6th 05 11:32 PM
WI airport closure Mike Spera Owning 0 March 9th 05 01:53 PM
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive William Summers Piloting 0 March 18th 04 03:03 AM
Rules on what can be in a hangar Brett Justus Owning 13 February 27th 04 05:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.