![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: Is this just a fluke or has their quality dropped in the 6 years or so since I last used their charts? Have you called them to inform them of the charting errors? I sent an email as I noted in my post. If I haven't heard anything by later today, I'll try the phone. I didn't figure anybody would be home last night at the time I found the errors. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
john smith wrote: Matt Whiting wrote: Is this just a fluke or has their quality dropped in the 6 years or so since I last used their charts? Have you called them to inform them of the charting errors? I sent an email as I noted in my post. If I haven't heard anything by later today, I'll try the phone. I didn't figure anybody would be home last night at the time I found the errors. Matt I received an email today saying that the errors I reported were in fact errors (gotta love the government) and that they would be corrected by NOTAM and the 9/29 change notice. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
I received an email today saying that the errors I reported were in fact errors (gotta love the government) and that they would be corrected by NOTAM and the 9/29 change notice. My concern would not be the errors you found, but rather the errors you didn't find. Hilton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hilton wrote:
Matt, I received an email today saying that the errors I reported were in fact errors (gotta love the government) and that they would be corrected by NOTAM and the 9/29 change notice. My concern would not be the errors you found, but rather the errors you didn't find. Yes. That is one of the reasons that I scan each new set of charts looking at the obvious things (Takeoff and alternate minimums, SIDS, STARS and the approaches at my home field). This is the first time I've found errors so I was rather surprised to quickly find two errors. Obviously, errors at unfamiliar fields would be much harder to find... Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hilton wrote: Matt, I received an email today saying that the errors I reported were in fact errors (gotta love the government) and that they would be corrected by NOTAM and the 9/29 change notice. My concern would not be the errors you found, but rather the errors you didn't find. A valid concern. The national airspace system is a bit like New Orleans, except the dikes haven't quite caved in...yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Mystery lines on NY VFR terminal chart | Ron Garret | Piloting | 3 | May 22nd 05 05:07 AM |
RAIM errors and the Apollo GPS | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | July 13th 04 03:12 PM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
King Videos: Jeppesen Chart Review (2 tapes on eBay) Approaches & Enroute, Departures, & Arrivals | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 11th 03 05:14 PM |