A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Piper Cherokee 140... good first plane?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 1st 05, 09:09 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
I'm usually not one to flame, but a few of these beg explanation.

: Some random observations:

: The up-front cost of a higher powered Cherokee is higher.

You mean 160hp 172 vs 160hp PA28? I find that hard to believe. I haven't
looked at prices for awhile so I suppose I could be mistaken, but I recall comparable
172s (same engine HP) were about $5-10K more than comparable PA28's.


No, sorry, I wasn't clear. I intended all comparisons to be relative to a
Cherokee 140. I understood the OP to be asking about Cherokee 140s vs higher
powered, more capable aircraft. I meant to speak only of comparisons within the
Piper family and didn't address differences with Cessnas.


: The fuel cost for a higher powered Cherokee is higher.

How is that? Same engine, same fuel, and perhaps slight speed advantage over
a 172... or are you comparing to a 15[02]? My post in the other thread went over the
speed vs. fuel thing. A 150hp cherokee at 55% cruise is the same speed and almost
identical fuel burn to a cessna 150 at 75%.


See above.


: The maintenance cost for a higher powered Cherokee is almost the same.

Pretty much. Unless you've got a strange bird, fixed gear with a normal
engine will be all pretty much the same.

: Many people (maybe not you) underestimate their mission. Mission creep sets in
: after you make the decision.

Agreed. I know I'm glad I got a PA28. We were looking hard at a Cessna 150
for it's cheap cost and mogas. Having a smallish range and load capacity ends up
being a lot more confining than you might think.

: The biggest cost is maintenance.

: The difference in maintenance cost is swamped by the variability in maintenance
: cost. That is, the maintenance cost is hard to predict for any given individual
: aircraft, and the slightly higher maintenance cost of the higher-powered models
: is a smaller difference than the seemingly random differences from airplane to
: airplane.

Quite true... don't get a lemon....

: You get to decide whether the additional capability is worth the extra up-front
: cost and fuel cost. You can ignore the difference in maintenance cost (which is
: your largest expense).

Fuel cost does not *have* to be much higher. Don't drive it like you stole
it, and fuel burn goes down quite a bit.


Quite so. I have a hard time remembering that when my hand is on the throttle. :-)


: Let the flames begin.

Agreed...

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My first aerobatic lesson Marco Rispoli Piloting 6 April 13th 05 02:21 PM
Four States and the Grand Canyon Mary Daniel or David Grah Soaring 6 December 6th 04 10:36 AM
Newbie seeking glider purchase advice Ted Wagner Soaring 19 January 2nd 04 07:00 PM
Piper Pacer , trade $$ plus plane for R 22 GASSITT Rotorcraft 0 December 22nd 03 02:35 AM
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) Marry Daniel or David Grah Soaring 18 July 30th 03 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.