A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Let's talk ground launching........



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 05, 11:15 AM
Chris Nicholas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high
tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier
than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11
gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley
diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to
Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small
rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large
rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them
so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in
emergency.

Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It
often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the
cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain
breaking strain.

Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest
rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break.
For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a
flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the
Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot
shaft.

For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to
pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise
the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might
be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the
pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle.

Chris N.




__________________________________________________ _________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com



  #2  
Old September 2nd 05, 12:06 PM
Rusty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello Again:
Thank you all for the response, it is all very welcome. I do live in
South Texas and we have access to a basically un-used well kept
200'x6000' hard packed grass field. We have recently picked up an
older winch that needs a litte TCL but with a little work will be very
usable. We are also setting up for straight auto-tow and are in the
process of building pulleys for reverse pulley. One of the many
questions I have is this: is a parachute necessary on straight auto-tow
and if so how far from the glider should the parachute be located?
Many more questions later.
Thanks
Rusty

Chris Nicholas wrote:
16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high
tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier
than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11
gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley
diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to
Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small
rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large
rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them
so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in
emergency.

Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It
often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the
cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain
breaking strain.

Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest
rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break.
For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a
flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the
Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot
shaft.

For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to
pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise
the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might
be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the
pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle.

Chris N.




__________________________________________________ _________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com


  #3  
Old September 2nd 05, 04:25 PM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Rusty wrote:
Hello Again:
Thank you all for the response, it is all very welcome. I do live in
South Texas and we have access to a basically un-used well kept
200'x6000' hard packed grass field. We have recently picked up an
older winch that needs a litte TCL but with a little work will be very
usable. We are also setting up for straight auto-tow and are in the
process of building pulleys for reverse pulley. One of the many
questions I have is this: is a parachute necessary on straight auto-tow
and if so how far from the glider should the parachute be located?
Many more questions later.
Thanks
Rusty

We did straight autotows for several years with a product known as
parafil. If there's a similar product, it might be a good option for
some. Some prior postings.

http://tinyurl.com/7em69

Frank

  #4  
Old September 2nd 05, 04:20 PM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Chris Nicholas wrote:
16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high
tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier
than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11
gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley
diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to
Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small
rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large
rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them
so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in
emergency.

Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It
often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the
cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain
breaking strain.

Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest
rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break.
For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a
flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the
Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot
shaft.

For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to
pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise
the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might
be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the
pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle.

Chris N.

When using steel wire and wheels/pulleys, the diameter of the
wheels/pulleys should be 60 times the diameter of the wire to prevent
work hardening. That's why 7/7 wire rope works with much small
diameter rollers and guides on winches.

See http://tinyurl.com/c3pd5

Frank Whiteley

  #5  
Old September 3rd 05, 10:32 AM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:15:14 UTC, Chris Nicholas
wrote:

: For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a
: flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the
: Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot
: shaft.

Who operates the guillotine in these systems? Do you need someone
stationed by the pulley, or is there some sort of remote actuation?

Personally, I think it's time we stopped messing about with spring
loaded cutters and went to explosive ones, but that's incidental here!

Ian
  #6  
Old September 3rd 05, 04:58 PM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ian Johnston wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:15:14 UTC, Chris Nicholas
wrote:

: For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a
: flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the
: Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot
: shaft.

Who operates the guillotine in these systems? Do you need someone
stationed by the pulley, or is there some sort of remote actuation?

Personally, I think it's time we stopped messing about with spring
loaded cutters and went to explosive ones, but that's incidental here!

Ian

The Cotswold Reverse Pulley had no guillotine and the reasoning was
that none was needed. The design was such that the tow vehicle end
would release if there was a release failure and the glider would pull
wire and tackle back through the pulley, as needed. IIRC, there were
two release failures in the 30 years of operation and that both
recovered okay.

Frank Whiteley

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got my ground instructor ratings Yossarian Piloting 7 July 6th 05 02:21 AM
Switching to ground.... David Rind Piloting 85 April 16th 04 06:53 PM
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates [email protected] Piloting 0 February 13th 04 04:30 AM
Wing in Ground Effect? BllFs6 Home Built 10 December 18th 03 05:11 AM
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding Fastglasair Home Built 1 July 8th 03 05:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.