|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 5th 05, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
HELLO!!! ARE YOU LISTENING JAY???
Where do you get this BS? IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO BUILD NEW REFINERIES. Hmmm. Zero refineries built in the 28 years since EPA regulations were rolled out. That would be, exactly, zero. Sure, Mike, it's not impossible. But it will probably take a presidential rescinding of the stupid EPA laws to get it done. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" 
|
|
#2
September 5th 05, 04:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:z2PSe.310396$_o.167366@attbi_s71... HELLO!!! ARE YOU LISTENING JAY??? Where do you get this BS? IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO BUILD NEW REFINERIES. Hmmm. Zero refineries built in the 28 years since EPA regulations were rolled out. That would be, exactly, zero. Sure, Mike, it's not impossible. But it will probably take a presidential rescinding of the stupid EPA laws to get it done. The time may have finally arrived when spending mega$$billions to build a new refinery may be economically feasible. Of course, that the EPA created the scenario where the costs attained that level will likely be missed. How much more does it cost (does it?) to ship gasoline (explosive) compared to raw petroleum?
|
|
#3
September 5th 05, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do believe that the Supreme Court would be most interested in the
executive branch rescinding something that the legislative branch enacted. Jim "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:z2PSe.310396$_o.167366@attbi_s71... Sure, Mike, it's not impossible. But it will probably take a presidential rescinding of the stupid EPA laws to get it done.
|
|
#4
September 5th 05, 05:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RST Engineering" wrote in message ... I do believe that the Supreme Court would be most interested in the executive branch rescinding something that the legislative branch enacted. Executive Order. "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool." --Paul Begala, Clinton presidential aide, July 1998 Sure, Mike, it's not impossible. But it will probably take a presidential rescinding of the stupid EPA laws to get it done.
|
|
#5
September 5th 05, 05:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aren't Executive Orders limited by the laws passed by Congress giving
the Executive the power? "Doof" wrote in message ... "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... I do believe that the Supreme Court would be most interested in the executive branch rescinding something that the legislative branch enacted. Executive Order. "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool." --Paul Begala, Clinton presidential aide, July 1998 Sure, Mike, it's not impossible. But it will probably take a presidential rescinding of the stupid EPA laws to get it done.
|
|
#6
September 5th 05, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"sfb" wrote:
Aren't Executive Orders limited by the laws passed by Congress giving the Executive the power? No. Executive Orders are orders issued to one or more Executive agencies. However, an executive order cannot conflict with or nullify any existing law passed by Congress. Fred F.
|
|
#7
September 5th 05, 07:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't the answer then yes as the Executive branch is always limited by
the law. "TaxSrv" wrote in message ... "sfb" wrote: Aren't Executive Orders limited by the laws passed by Congress giving the Executive the power? No. Executive Orders are orders issued to one or more Executive agencies. However, an executive order cannot conflict with or nullify any existing law passed by Congress. Fred F.
|
|
#8
September 5th 05, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"sfb" wrote:
Isn't the answer then yes as the Executive branch is always limited by the law. They're limited by law if law exists, and of course they're always bound by the Constitution. Most Executive Orders cover matters where there is no law on a specific topic. Fred F.
|
|
#9
September 7th 05, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do believe that the Supreme Court would be most interested in the
executive branch rescinding something that the legislative branch enacted. True, but a president can declare a state of emergency, and simply order it to be built. By the time this case works its way to the Supreme Court, we'll be awash in cheap gasoline! ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination"
|
|
#10
September 7th 05, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:TvCTe.315710$_o.147031@attbi_s71... I do believe that the Supreme Court would be most interested in the executive branch rescinding something that the legislative branch enacted. True, but a president can declare a state of emergency, and simply order it to be built. By the time this case works its way to the Supreme Court, we'll be awash in cheap gasoline! ;-) Better yet, require the money that would be paid as the Winfall Profits Tax be spent on new refining capability within the borders of the US.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Orleans Lakefront Airport | Dan Luke | Piloting | 57 | September 6th 05 03:13 AM |
| Cedar Rapids to New Orleans | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | March 29th 05 02:07 AM |
| Flying into New Orleans area...... some ? ? | kontiki | Piloting | 4 | August 29th 04 02:09 PM |
Hybrid Mode
