![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Megginson wrote:
Bob Gardner wrote: We have an *authorized procedure* out here in the Pacific Northwest, developed by the FSDO Aviation Safety Manager and the folks at the TRACON, specifically for use when icing conditions are forecast. It is called "Radar Vectors for Ice" and involves vectors to climb away from the Cascades until high enough to be well above the freezing level or in the clear. Obviously, since this procedure was developed by the FAA and published in the Safety Program newsletter every year at this time, a forecast of icing conditions is not, in and of itself, a bar to flight. Of course not -- airspace is three-dimensional. I don't cancel a flight planned for 4000 ft in the summer because there's icing forecast from 15,000 to 20,000 ft. I wonder if there is anyone in this group who is seriously arguing that I should cancel such a flight. Ron Natalie just said that. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message ... Ron Natalie just said that. I did not. I said that 91.527 didn't differentiate between IFR in VMC and IFR in IMC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message ... Ron Natalie just said that. I did not. I said that 91.527 didn't differentiate between IFR in VMC and IFR in IMC. My apology. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|