![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:08:08 +0000, Don Johnstone wrote:
If I were to be persuaded that an ELT was a necessary peice of equipment, and in the UK at least I see no urgent need... I beg to disagree: there are quite enough corners of the UK where you can crash unobserved and are unlikely to be found until a farm hand comes by on a tractor next day or next week. One thing bothers me about the UK scene: although the dropping of 121.5 MHz by CORPAS-SARSAT is an international decision and will affect UK users, there seems to be no publicity for it here and no 406 MHz ELT equipment available or promised by the likes of RD Aviation. I notice that all ELT units are very low power on 121.5. They are either 100 mW or don't bother to quote power, so I assume they are 100 mW by default. I would not want to rely on such a low power transmitter for non-satellite crashed detection. Can any of our American friends say what the typical detection range is for either 90C or 406 ELTs on 121.5? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
FAI Sporting Code Section 3 experts wanted | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 28 | September 1st 04 05:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |