Missed approach (?) when glideslope fails

"Hilton" wrote in message
ink.net...

You work for Microsoft?


Nope. Do you hold an instrument rating?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Hilton wrote:

You work for Microsoft?


Nope. Do you hold an instrument rating?

I really dislike these ****ing contests on the NGs because I think that
everyone's input is perfect valid and should be seriously considered whether
they are a student pilot or a high-time 747 Captain.

But if you're bored enough, Hilton in San Jose, CA will get my details on
landings.com

Hilton

"Hilton" wrote in message
ink.net...

I really dislike these ****ing contests on the NGs because I think that
everyone's input is perfect valid and should be seriously considered
whether they are a student pilot or a high-time 747 Captain.


I seriously considered your input, it took just a few nanoseconds for me to
determine it was not valid. You asserted there's no way to ensure you are
at the MAP without timing from the FAF. That's simply not correct.



But if you're bored enough, Hilton in San Jose, CA will get my details on
landings.com


I asked only because you don't seem to have a good knowledge of ILS.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
I seriously considered your input, it took just a few nanoseconds for
me to determine it was not valid. You asserted there's no way to
ensure you are at the MAP without timing from the FAF. That's simply
not correct.

Well Steven, why don't you just come right out and tell them
about the Middle Marker?

Bob Moore

Bob Moore wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

I seriously considered your input, it took just a few nanoseconds for
me to determine it was not valid. You asserted there's no way to
ensure you are at the MAP without timing from the FAF. That's simply
not correct.


Well Steven, why don't you just come right out and tell them
about the Middle Marker?

Bob Moore
Most MMs have been decommissioned.