Logging Approach Question

Gerald,
Hilton wrote:
BTW: Wasn't that SQL GPS marked N/A for a really long time, or am I
thinking
of another approach?

correct it was but they opened it up about a year ago.

Thanks, I never knew they opened it up. I seem to remember that the missed
went over SFO and they didn't want a 'missed' to hold up operations at SFO.
Now I see the missed is a left turn away from SFO - perhaps they changed the
missed and that allowed them to remove it from the NA list? Someone correct
me if my memory of the 'old' missed is incorrect.

Thanks,

Hilton

"Hilton" wrote in
. net:

Gerald,
Hilton wrote:
BTW: Wasn't that SQL GPS marked N/A for a really long time, or am I
thinking
of another approach?

correct it was but they opened it up about a year ago.

Thanks, I never knew they opened it up. I seem to remember that the
missed went over SFO and they didn't want a 'missed' to hold up
operations at SFO. Now I see the missed is a left turn away from SFO -
perhaps they changed the missed and that allowed them to remove it
from the NA list? Someone correct me if my memory of the 'old' missed
is incorrect.

Thanks,

Hilton




Your memory of the old missed is indeed correct! From the chart dated 15
JUL 1999, "MISSED APPROACH - Climb to 4000 via 302 course to SFO VOR/DME
and hold."

--
Marty Shapiro
Silicon Rallye Inc.

(remove SPAMNOT to email me)

Marty wrote:
Your memory of the old missed is indeed correct! From the chart dated 15
JUL 1999, "MISSED APPROACH - Climb to 4000 via 302 course to SFO VOR/DME
and hold."

Marty, thanks for the post. I remember being amazed that given an infinite
number of points to choose from (since it is a GPS approach), they chose the
SFO VOR!

Hilton