![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The NTSB considers pilot reports to be "anectdotal" and relies solely on
government sources. The case law on this comes from a guy in upstate NY who relied on pilot reports of no icing, took off into what they consider known icing conditions, and....after a decent period...crashed. Bob Gardner "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... In a previous article, ET said: "Colin Kingsbury" wrote in news:XW4Ab.542 : Of course, there's a lot of flights that will get scrubbed in an SR-22 because of icing, so this isn't a good plane for you. My father owns SR-22, it has an anti-icing system (sprays solution out from micro holes in the wings/prop/etc)... I am not yet a pilot, so I'm certain I don't understand all the complexities of this, but would an SR-22 with this system still be as limited as your statement suggests?? The TKS system is to escape inadvertent ice, not to fly into known icing conditions. So yes, it would be limited as Colin suggested. Especially since the FAA is now regarding "known icing conditions" to mean any time when there is a mention of icing in the forecast, even if you have pireps of no icing. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "I didn't know it was impossible when I did it." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|