![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:03:26 -0400, Wizard of Draws
wrote: I would say that you don't need to, but if you're on the gauges, your outside scan is minimal and it just might be prudent to have a second set of eyeballs looking out for you with radar. FF is good too, but they may not be able to handle you as VFR traffic. I sure don't object to someone filing IFR whenever they have to "go on the gauges". However, when I'm on an IFR flight plan, I really don't have much difficulty including the outside in my scan. When VMC on a moonless, dark night, the ability to see other traffic is enhanced, in my experience. Flying from, let us say, PVC (Provincetown) to Nashua (ASH), going VFR gives one a lot of flexibility that IFR does not. I've never had a problem with flight following in that area. And I can imagine that other areas IFR flight would also be unneccessarily restrictive in terms of routes or altitudes, especially if in a non-radar environment. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
Logging Flight Time Question | Phoenix Pilot | Piloting | 1 | June 13th 04 06:23 PM |
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | April 16th 04 12:41 PM |
Study pilot workload during approach and landing | Freshfighter | Piloting | 5 | December 7th 03 04:06 PM |