A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

H2 Combustion-Booster Claimed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 05, 04:59 PM
Harry Andreas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Bryan Martin
wrote:

Lets see. You take energy from the electrical system to crack water into H2
and O2. Then you pipe the H2 into the engine with the gasoline where it will
combine with oxygen to form water. The article I read doesn't say what you
do with the O2, I guess you just vent that to the atmosphere. Seeing as how
conversion of water into H2 and O2 is not 100% efficient due to losses in
the wiring and such and seeing as how burning H2 with air is also not 100%
efficient, there is no possible way to get a net energy gain out of this
system. In fact this system will result in a net loss and lower fuel economy
since the electrical energy to drive the electrolysis must come eventually
from the alternator which is driven by the engine.


That's the Second Law of Thermodynamics: in ANY energy conversion scheme
there is inefficiency and therefore loss.


The only way to get any kind of gain out of this is to inject the water
itself into the engine. This might give some power gain in the short term
but pumping salt water into your fuel system and engine will certainly do
them no good in the long run. The article specifically mentioned putting
water and an electrolyte (salt) into the booster tank.


Agree on the salt.
Water injection only works to increase power if you increase engine
compression. The higher compression ratio gets you more power, the
water injection cools the charge and acts like an octane booster.
Just don't run out of water...
If you run water without increasing compression ratio, you will get a little
due to the density increase of the air, but it's not major.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
  #2  
Old September 20th 05, 06:25 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Harry Andreas wrote:
In article , Bryan Martin
wrote:

...


The only way to get any kind of gain out of this is to inject the water
itself into the engine. This might give some power gain in the short term
but pumping salt water into your fuel system and engine will certainly do
them no good in the long run. The article specifically mentioned putting
water and an electrolyte (salt) into the booster tank.


Agree on the salt.


Someone else wrote that it was KOH that was added, not a salt.
Dunno why, if it was just a water injection system. Would the
KOH help to control NOx emmissions? Could the KOH be threre
for boiling point elevation?

Water injection only works to increase power if you increase engine
compression. The higher compression ratio gets you more power, the
water injection cools the charge and acts like an octane booster.
Just don't run out of water...


If you are injecting atomized (e.g. liquid) water into the
cylinders then during the power stroke the water will
evaporate. That evaporation converts heat to pressure at
constant temperature. You get a higher compression raio
without a higher temperature. Does THAT help to control NOx,
in addition to giving you more power?

If you run water without increasing compression ratio, you will get a little
due to the density increase of the air, but it's not major.


IIUC, adding the water will increase the compression ratio
due to the phase change of the water. Water injection increases
the compression ratio without changing the geometry of the cylinder
and piston, right?

--

FF

  #5  
Old September 20th 05, 07:06 PM
Capt. Geoffry Thorpe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Water can reduce the charge termperature as it evaporates in the cylinder
which can increase the charge mass a little, but mostly it improves knock
resistance by cooling the charge and increasing the specific heat of the
charge mass. But to really take advantage you have to either increase the
compression ratio or boost.
NOx is recduced somewhat since the peak temperatures are reduced.

If you are trying to change the fuel chemestry to get more energy out - you
have to put energy in. Lose - lose.

If you are trying to make the fuel burn "better" to make it "all" burn -
gasoline burns just fine. Unburned fuel in the exhaust comes from three
primary sources - mixture that is pushed into the crevices around the piston
/ sparkplug / etc. where it can't burn (it comes out of the crevices during
the exhaust stroke), mixture that is quenched at the cylinder walls due to
heat loss. And excess fuel from running rich. The bulk of the charge mass
burns just fine. Cow magnets, magic additives, whatever aren't going to
change any of that.

If making the fuel burn "better" made it burn faster - Well, if it really
worked all you would do is destroy the engine because the faster combustion
would result in detonation.

--
Geoff
the sea hawk at wow way d0t com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader.


  #6  
Old September 21st 05, 01:22 AM
Harry Andreas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Capt. Geoffry
Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote:

Water can reduce the charge termperature as it evaporates in the cylinder
which can increase the charge mass a little, but mostly it improves knock
resistance by cooling the charge and increasing the specific heat of the
charge mass. But to really take advantage you have to either increase the
compression ratio or boost.
NOx is recduced somewhat since the peak temperatures are reduced.

If you are trying to change the fuel chemestry to get more energy out - you
have to put energy in. Lose - lose.

If you are trying to make the fuel burn "better" to make it "all" burn -
gasoline burns just fine. Unburned fuel in the exhaust comes from three
primary sources - mixture that is pushed into the crevices around the piston
/ sparkplug / etc. where it can't burn (it comes out of the crevices during
the exhaust stroke), mixture that is quenched at the cylinder walls due to
heat loss. And excess fuel from running rich. The bulk of the charge mass
burns just fine. Cow magnets, magic additives, whatever aren't going to
change any of that.


Actually, ( I was trying to make it simple ) either compression or boost can
be expressed as as BMEP, which takes both into account.
As BMEP rises you get better combustion of any unburned fuel from being
too rich (not a factor in today's autos) , but the higher pressure also
suppresses
the boundary layer at the cylinder wall, giving better combustion there also
and lower unburned hydrocarbons as a result.
Using water injection, as you say, allows you to increase BMEP without
risking knock because it cools the intake charge, acting (as I said) like
an octane improver.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
  #7  
Old September 21st 05, 03:34 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Capt. Geoffry Thorpe wrote:
Water can reduce the charge termperature as it evaporates in the cylinder
which can increase the charge mass a little, but mostly it improves knock
resistance by cooling the charge and increasing the specific heat of the
charge mass. But to really take advantage you have to either increase the
compression ratio or boost.
NOx is recduced somewhat since the peak temperatures are reduced.

If you are trying to change the fuel chemestry to get more energy out - you
have to put energy in. Lose - lose.

If you are trying to make the fuel burn "better" to make it "all" burn -
gasoline burns just fine. Unburned fuel in the exhaust comes from three
primary sources - mixture that is pushed into the crevices around the piston
/ sparkplug / etc. where it can't burn (it comes out of the crevices during
the exhaust stroke), mixture that is quenched at the cylinder walls due to
heat loss. And excess fuel from running rich. The bulk of the charge mass
burns just fine. Cow magnets, magic additives, whatever aren't going to
change any of that.


Ah but the thermodynamic efficiency of a heat engine increases as
the compression ratio or temperature ratio increases. The issue
is not how to get more heat out of the fuel, it is how to convert
more of the heat to mechanical energy.

--

FF

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes WalterM140 Military Aviation 428 July 1st 04 11:16 PM
fetters or fetter's booster? Cy Galley Home Built 11 March 12th 04 10:46 PM
high-speed camera view of a piston intake, combustion, exhaust R.Hubbell General Aviation 0 February 20th 04 03:36 AM
59% increase in pulling power is claimed for an unusual new rotor propeller for airplanes Larry Dighera Piloting 5 November 21st 03 02:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.