A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Toasted my engine



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 05, 04:20 PM
Marco Leon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Definitely warrants a separate post. With an 800 hour (SMOH) engine, this
news definitely has raised an eyebrow.

Any more stories of "early" overhauls that anyone care to share?

Marco Leon


"Kobra" wrote in message
...
Flyers,

This was part of a post in "Selling my Garmin 296" and decided to make it

a
separate post. Sorry for the redundancy.


Kobra wrote:
...I toasted my engine about 3 weeks ago.



Urgh. Sorry to hear that. What happened?


I have a Cardinal RG with a IO-360A1B6 with 1000 hours on it. On one

short
30 min. flight to Cape May, NJ (WWD) I noticed a small amount of oil

running
down the nose gear door. I did a cursory look and found the oil level
unchanged and saw nothing through the oil access door. I wiped it off.

On the flight back all oil indicators were fine. When I landed the drip

of
oil was back. No big oil loss, but when you fly the same airplane you

know
what's suppose to be there and what's not. I called my mechanic and
co-owner and explained the problem. At first the mechanic was not
concerned.

My partner flew a few days later on a short flight and when he landed the
A&P came over to say hello. He then noticed the oil on the gear door. He
grounded the plane and the next day called me to the airport. He showed

me
a pretty good leak coming through something called a "though-bolt" on the
number two cylinder. A though-bolt is a long bolt that goes completely
through the engine from one cylinder to the other and helps keep the case
enlighten and tight.

That wasn't the big problem though, he said I could fly with a minor leak

at
the through-bolt to TBO. Next he did a dye penetrate test and found a

crack
in the case in front of the number 4 jug at one of the studs for that
cylinder. That did it. The engine had to come off, the case split and a
new case was ordered.

The story goes on though. As he was taking the engine off he found one
other interesting item. One of the through-bolt nuts on the bottom of
cylinder number 3 was sheared off completely flush the cylinder base.
That's when the hair on the back of my neck stood up. I have to think

that
all this was related as the nut was still laying in the bottom of the
engine. This was recent!

Next I had a recollection of starting the engine before my flight to WWD

and
I remember that I heard a "snap!" just as the engine caught. It was loud
enough to make me say, "...what the %$#@ was that?!" and just soft enough
for me to dismiss it and ponder, "...did you really hear what you think

you
heard?"

The rest is speculation, but maybe that was the nut snapping off and
something bad happened in the engine causing the leak at the through bolt

on
number two cylinder. Maybe the engine was ready to self-destruct in the

air
on the next flight. Who knows? But I hope to learn more when the engine

is
broken down and inspected. I will keep you all posted if you are
interested.

Kobra





Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #2  
Old September 21st 05, 11:39 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Saying the engine has 800 hours doesn't really say much. I'd be more
interested in how many years since overhaul. There are a lot of planes
for sale out there with low time engines that have sat for many years.
I would not feel comfortable flying behind an 800 hour engine if it has
sat for 10 years.

-Robert

  #3  
Old September 21st 05, 11:41 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert M. Gary wrote:

I would not feel comfortable flying behind an 800 hour engine if it has
sat for 10 years.


I'm a little nervous flying behind one that has sat for 6 months.

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine Balancing and Resonance Vibration Problem AllanFuller Owning 13 September 12th 05 12:51 AM
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I Robert Clark Military Aviation 2 May 26th 04 06:42 PM
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use Cy Galley Home Built 10 February 6th 04 03:03 PM
What if the germans... Charles Gray Military Aviation 119 January 26th 04 11:20 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.